Wednesday, December 18, 2024
Home Blog Page 2

From Courtroom to Foreign Service: Michelo Chizombe’s Swift Reward

28

President Hakainde Hichilema has reportedly rewarded Michelo Chizombe, the petitioner in the case that disqualified former President Edgar Lungu from contesting future elections, with a diplomatic role in Zambia’s foreign service. Chizombe, who has completed diplomatic training at the Zambia Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies (ZIDIS), is set to be deployed alongside other graduates, including notable members of the UPND Youth Wing.

The move has drawn significant attention, with questions arising over whether this appointment is a reward for Chizombe’s role in one of the most consequential legal battles in recent Zambian politics. Chizombe’s petition led to the Constitutional Court ruling that Lungu, having served two terms, was ineligible to run in future elections under constitutional provisions.

The ruling was seen as a landmark decision, effectively barring one of the ruling party’s most formidable political opponents. Now, with Chizombe’s diplomatic deployment imminent, the timing has fueled widespread speculation about its implications for governance, the judiciary, and Zambia’s foreign service appointments.

According to reports, Chizombe trained at ZIDIS alongside other high-profile UPND members, including Lusaka Youth Province figures such as Matomola Likwanya. This batch of trainees is said to be preparing for postings as Zambia bolsters its diplomatic presence under the new administration. However, the inclusion of individuals with close ties to the ruling party in this process has raised eyebrows, with some interpreting it as a sign of the growing influence of party politics in state institutions.

The case that propelled Chizombe into the spotlight was one of significant national interest. Lungu’s eligibility to run for office was contested on the basis of constitutional limits, and the Constitutional Court ruled that his previous terms in office disqualified him from seeking another term. While the ruling was celebrated by many as a reaffirmation of constitutionalism, others viewed it as a politically charged decision with far-reaching consequences for Zambia’s political landscape.

Chizombe’s subsequent diplomatic training and appointment have added a new layer to the story. For many, this move signals a recognition of his role in reshaping Zambia’s political terrain. His swift transition from petitioner to trainee diplomat has become a talking point, with speculation swirling about whether this was a strategic reward for his involvement in the case.

Meanwhile, the foreign service training program at ZIDIS has itself come under scrutiny, as questions emerge about its selection criteria and the inclusion of prominent UPND affiliates. While diplomatic training is standard for those entering the foreign service, the current cohort’s composition has attracted attention, given the political profiles of some trainees.

The deployment of Chizombe and his colleagues comes as Zambia seeks to enhance its diplomatic efforts globally. The government has highlighted the importance of strengthening international ties and leveraging diplomatic channels to foster economic growth and development. However, the perception of political appointments in the foreign service risks overshadowing these efforts.

As Chizombe prepares for his new role, the story continues to captivate Zambians. His journey from petitioner in a high-stakes legal battle to foreign service appointee marks a significant chapter in the unfolding political narrative of the Hichilema administration.

Aaron Mudenda.

Political Analyst.

 

A Letter to the Love of My Life

Dear Zambia,

I deeply love you, and my affection for you is unwavering. Nothing can diminish my enduring and everlasting love for you.

I owe you a debt of gratitude. You gave me life, nurtured me, and continue to sustain me. Like so many others, it is my duty and responsibility to safeguard your well-being and ensure your prosperity.

I am acutely aware of those who seek to exploit you for their own gain. These opportunists, envious of our bond, aim to come between us and alienate you from me. Yet my love for you remains pure and steadfast, unshaken by any evil intentions.

This year, as in years past, I have fought for you to the best of my ability, through conviction and the pen. My efforts have always been dedicated to the truth and helping you perceive the threats that jeopardise your well-being and your future.

Despite my warnings about the myriad forces that seek to harm you, your response has been discouraging. At times, it feels as though you are indifferent to the dangers that surround you. There have been moments when I felt tempted to give up, but I remained committed to you and my love for you is strong.

One day, I believe you will come to recognise the truth that those who lead you now and preside over your well-being may not have your best interests at heart. When that day comes, you may also understand the depth of my care and the sacrifices I have made and continue to make for you.

I have hoped for reciprocity in our bond, but it has not come. Even when I have given everything, you have often remained distant and unresponsive. Yet your indifference only deepens my curiosity and sense of responsibility towards you. My love is not contingent upon acknowledgment or return. It is a reflection of my nature, an innate part of who I am.

Like the sun, I will continue to rise and shine for you. My commitment to doing what is right and just will not waver, regardless of whether it is recognised or appreciated. While some may celebrate the light I bring, others may focus on the imperfections. Nevertheless, I persist.

My affection for you is unwavering, and our bond is inseparable. I remain hopeful that the coming year will bring clarity and enlightenment to you. May the Universe grant you the ability to see through the shadows and discern the path forward.

I wish you nothing but the best as we end another year together and as we step into another.

Love always

Sishuwa

Concourt Long Awaited Judgement On Edgar Chagwa Lungu’s Eligibility

The historical and monumental judgment on the eligibility of Sixth President Edgar Chagwa Lungu finally came to pass on Tuesday 10 th December 2024. For the first time in our history, the judgment in an honourable court of high standing was televised and broadcast live on both ZNBC TV and Radio II.

It made people to have a broader other than a keyhole view on the proceedings of the Constitutional Court. Watching it live was pleasant and heartwarming to the ones who did not face the monster of load-shedding which has affected the area where I reside more adversely than some parts of Luanshya. This is not a verdict that should make anyone despondent to the extreme where one can even suffer a deadly stroke with a raptured vein. It is bitter pill to swallow to the ardent supporters of ECL who were firmly optimistic that their hero was going to get the favour of the court to stand in 2026. One key observation I have personally made on the diehard PF cadres and sympathisers is that they always win even before the election is held and their robust sense of optimism is what makes them unique as all round victors from the days of the founder of the Patriotic Front party Michael Chilufya Sata who, even in his grave, stands out as an indomitable optimist and tough tested politician with a strong spirit of resilience and fortitude.

Though ECL did try to divert from the path carved out by the mighty King Spitting Cobra, he to a great extent sought to emulate Chilufya Sata but somewhat failed to be like him though he was his disciple recruited from Anderson Kambela Mazoka’s UPND which he later despised just as his crown heir to the PF throne Given Lubinda also detested his former party UPND after his mentor Sakwiba Sikota was defeated at the polls of Mazoka’s succession by Hakainde Hichilema. Sakwiba had to loan Given to PF after the ignominious agony of defeat he suffered as a 100% Mazoka loyalist. Many political pundits had expected Sakie to inherit Mazoka’s Presidency of the UPND. Alas! The little known and non-political fellow taken to be a novice in partisan politics got the honour and splendour of victory. Pardon me for diverting to the least expected.

The ConCourt judgment has broken so many hearts and it has left hundreds of ECL’s supporters and sympathisers terminally sick and pessimistic. To some, the verdict has left them speechless as they seem not to have appropriate words to convey to the Boma giant whose legacy of cadre benevolence and all -weather support now seems to have gone against the grains. The ConCourt judgment rubbed them the wrong way. Many of them are burdened with loads and loads of setbacks and tormented by unfelt headaches which are all driving them to the cliff edge of ultimate extinction. They had persuaded ECL to come back to active partisan politics and rule Zambia from where he left. They had seen the party besieged by so many folks who had no money they needed but manifesting aspirations to oust his favourite comrade Given Lubinda Sata called a tourist attraction. Faces of Chishimba Kambwili, Emmanuel Mwamba, Miles Sampa, Geoffrey Bwalya Mwamba Brian Mundubile, Chitalu Chilufya and a Mucheleka popped up on the scene and openly declared interest in the PF Presidency but their delay in convening the PF Congress to supplant Lungu who had left his dummy Lubinda to warm the seat as his faithful apostle-cum-seer gave courage to young Miles to hold a Congress where he was elected as PF President. Their appeals to the courts nosedived and Miles got the stamp of legitimacy.

Lungu came out of his shell and announced his return to active politics. This was not strange. He had not anointed Given to replace him but to keep the seat warm and sustain calmness on the waters the PF boat was sailing upon. He came back and gave optimism to many cadres whose hopes were in shreds and longed for a Saviour in Lungu. The Articles of the Republican Constitution prohibitive of one who stood twice in presidential elections not to stand did not matter to them. They wanted ECL the giant of the party who attained heights of indispensables to come back and develop Zambia alone, not any other. They had missed sleek brandy new banknotes thrown into their presence like confetti. Nobody else but Lungu could give them money without sweating for it. The frustrations from Miles hurt ECL and time proved opportune for him to make a grand comeback to active politics. Robert Chabinga the little man with a fixed smile became more PF than Lungu and Miles. He was once an MMD self-proclaimed leader of party intelligence under Rupiah Banda. He won the Mafinga seat on PF ticket and had to throw his hat in the ring for HH. He expelled both Lungu and Sampa even when he was not an inch closer to Sata when he founded the PF with Guy Scott and few loyalists.

The petition filed at the Constitutional Court by Michelo Chizombe was motivated by ECL’s comeback to active politics. He was used talking to thousands of loyal cadres and sympathisers and his confinement to a house owned by a footballer made him uncomfortable as politics became part of his life in eternity. He really wanted to revenge his stunning defeat which made him eat his words in 2021 after 12th August which by his estimation he had won with over 500,000 votes. The votes of victory seemed to have eluded ECL. Reality dawned upon him to his utter disbelief. He never handed power to himself. He handed over the instruments to his archenemy HH. This made him a courageous man. He conceded defeat against his will. His forced eligibility to stand in the Presidential Election of 2021 was to break his heart eventually. Chizombe had come out to petition his eligibility to stand in the 2021 which was somewhat like flogging a dead horse. He had lost elections and his heart was broken. Bitterness could have swelled up his heart and he got encouraged when he saw PF diehards and natural supporters who enjoyed the way Boma ni Lungu feted them. Their pockets were overflowing with money. Some had died of depression at the loss of elections. Hard work and resourcefulness were all in ECL and in him was a redoubtable saviour kinsman. Had the ConCourt upheld the eligibility of Lungu, euphoria could have spread like wildfire in a plain of dry twigs and leaves across the constituencies where his finances as President went flowing like a river breaking its banks at great speed. Lungu became a personality cult in the hearts of many of his sympathisers. Sata never wanted to be idolised.

Lungu bathed in hero worship of himself by cadres. He was a demigod. The deputy Chief Justice eloquently read the judgment pouring out a glut of precedents and references which were to the voracious consumption of the State and those on the side of ECL who viciously and valiantly punched holes in the entire judgment discourse.
It cannot be easy for ECL and his disciples to accept the judgment with respect to the men and women who adjudicated the case. Loss of a case where one is optimistic is greater agony mightier than death itself. However, ECL is alive and well and just has to go to the lonely school of reflection and positive action which can contribute to nation-building. He is the only surviving former President. Five are gone to the land of the silent. Many people would look up to him as a statesman who should help reconstruct Zambia . Enmity in politics is a serious setback to national progress.

The comeback of Lula in Brazil; Trump in the United States and John Dramani Mahama in Ghana may give ECL some ray of optimism but these countries have diametrically different constitutions and their people have temperaments Zambians may have. The pain in ECL is heavy and will be incessant if his eyes will still be focused on getting back to State House at whatever cost. Vindictiveness and obliteration of opponents belong to barbarians. Graceful acceptance of defeat in elections and court judgments is what makes a person greater than all odds against him. Pity parties and self-seeking glory can harden hearts and turn one into a Jonas Savimbi or a Foday Sankoh.

The hate among politicians is so cruel that if can quickly lead the country into tribal wars and religious antagonisms. Zambia is greater than both HH and ECL. We all need each other regardless of our political and ideological convictions. Zambia being a Christian nation should not fall into the trap of satanic forces. Ecclesiastical leaders must swallow their partisan interests and give guidance to both leaders in government and outside government. This is not a Kingdom solely ascribed upon an individual politician and his loyalists or associates. I wonder why some eminent personages like State Counsel John Peter Sangwa and Senior Counsel Kelvin Fube Bwalya are feeling today after playing double standards in 2021 and in 2024 over the eligibility of ECL. In 2021 JPS and KBF sounded their warning to Lungu that he was not eligible to stand in the 12 August 2021 Elections because he had stood in the By Election of 2015 after the demise of President Michael Sata and later stood in 2016 as his own candidate. Both were insistent and persistent on ECL’S inegibility to stand.

This was before a number of television cameras and thousands watched them on Camnet interviewed by Frank Mutubila. This year they had a 360 degree turn around and backed his eligibility for the 2026 Presidential Election as well as the 2021 election which is now water under the bridge. This issue of ECL will rage on for weeks and weeks but with the passage of time it may wear out and down as it will become unproductive and amount to worship of personality cults. May the Lord God Almighty help our political leaders to reach levels of maturity expected. They delight in going round circles like overgrown children. When will they grow into responsible and accountable people as senior political leaders in a country held in higher esteem on the continent? Cry for the beloved Mother Zambia.

By Shadon Chanda

Revamp Needed for Copper Queens’ Strategy to Dominate African Football

Revamp Needed for Copper Queens’ Strategy to Dominate African Football

The Zambian women’s football landscape showcases remarkable potential, especially when observing the U17 and U20 squads. These young teams have consistently impressed with their confident possession-based football, tactical discipline, and midfield dominance. Players such as Namute Chileshe, Mercy Chipasula, Lungowe Namasiku, and Ruth Muwowo highlight the firepower in attack, yet their gameplay remains rooted in strategy rather than raw athleticism alone.

The recent COSAFA showcase was a prime example of how possession football, combined with tactical execution, can be transformative. The question remains: why hasn’t this approach been fully adopted by the Copper Queens at the senior level? With players of immense talent and potential in the current setup, Zambia could cement its place as a football powerhouse on the continent.

A standout example is Blessings Maluba, the U20 midfielder whose composure, clean passing, and powerful shots embody the ideal defensive midfielder. Her integration into the senior squad could inject the much-needed control and creativity the team requires. Similarly, future prospects like Taonga Mubanga from the U17 squad offer a long-term solution in midfield with her box-to-box prowess.

The key lies in scouting, planning, and gradual integration of young talents into the senior team. Players such as Mwila Mufunte (goalkeeper), Saliya Mwanza (fullback), Margaret Gondwe and Jessy Zulu (center backs), and the dynamic Blessings Zangose Zulu (box-to-box midfielder) must be prioritized for their technical abilities. Combining their skills with seasoned players like Grace Chanda—despite her recent struggles with injuries—would create a well-rounded and competitive squad.

With WAFCON fast approaching, the urgency for change cannot be overstated. The Copper Queens need fresh perspectives on the technical bench. A new coach, assistant coach, and technical advisor who prioritize tactical play, long-term player development, and strategic integration of emerging stars could revolutionize the team.

Failure to adapt and identify successors for aging players such as Susan Banda, Rachael Nachula, and Kabange Mupopo risks leaving the team unprepared for future challenges. The time to act is now, ensuring the Copper Queens not only compete but dominate African football by leveraging their vast pool of talent and embracing a strategy rooted in possession and tactical execution.

Source: African Football With Uncle Luck

High Court Returns Woodlands Stadium and Lewanika Mall Land to Lusaka City Club

In a landmark ruling that underscores the importance of fairness in property disputes, the Lusaka High Court has returned ownership of the Woodlands Stadium and Lewanika Mall land to the Lusaka City Football Club. The decision, delivered by Judge Situmbeko Chocho on Thursday, December 12, 2024, comes after a prolonged legal battle that brought into focus issues of ownership, governance, and restitution.

The case, filed by Christopher Chilongo on behalf of Lusaka City Club, challenged the controversial transfer of the land and its associated developments. In her judgment, Judge Chocho directed that Cavmont FMO Corporation and Forli Ltd, key stakeholders in the development of the disputed properties, be compensated for their investments. Furthermore, the court provided a four-month timeframe for the parties to resolve issues surrounding rightful ownership and compensation under the oversight of the Registrar of Societies.

In her detailed ruling, Judge Chocho concluded that the plaintiff, Lusaka City Football Club, had presented a compelling case warranting the reversion of ownership. She ordered that the ownership status of Stand No. 2757 (Woodlands Stadium) and Stand No. 3034 (Lewanika Mall) revert to the governance structure established at the club’s incorporation as City of Lusaka Football Club (2000) PLC.

Judge Chocho emphasized the need for justice to balance the scales. “It is in the interests of justice that the second defendant be restituted and compensated for the developments on the plaintiff’s land,” she stated. To ensure equitable compensation, the court ruled that the plaintiff would bear 10% of the estimated value of the developments, while the first defendant, Cavmont FMO Corporation, would shoulder the remaining 90%, given their central role in orchestrating the events that led to the dispute.

The judgment also outlined the responsibilities of Cavmont FMO Corporation, ordering them to adequately compensate Forli Ltd for all losses and damages incurred due to the irregular actions surrounding the resolutions and purported sale of shares and assets of the club.

For Lusaka City Club, the ruling marks a significant victory and a restoration of its historical identity. Established in 1970, the club has been a cornerstone of Lusaka’s sporting and community activities. The court’s decision to return the land and facilities signals a renewed opportunity for the club to strengthen its role in the city’s cultural and sporting fabric.

However, the judgment also places a financial burden on the club, which is required to contribute to the compensation for the developments made by Forli Ltd. Observers have noted that this aspect of the ruling could pose challenges for the club unless it mobilizes resources effectively.

Speaking after the judgment, Chilongo expressed optimism about the future. “This is a moment of great relief and a testament to the resilience of Lusaka City Club. We are committed to ensuring that the compensation process is conducted fairly and that the club moves forward stronger than ever,” he said.

The ruling has elicited a range of responses from stakeholders. Legal analysts have praised the court for its balanced approach, highlighting the emphasis on restitution and equitable compensation as a model for resolving similar disputes.

Forli Ltd, one of the affected developers, acknowledged the court’s efforts to address their losses but signaled that further negotiations would be critical. A spokesperson noted, “We respect the court’s decision and will engage in the compensation discussions as outlined. It is our hope that all parties approach this process with goodwill and fairness.”

On the other hand, Cavmont FMO Corporation has yet to issue a formal statement. However, industry insiders suggest that the ruling could have broader implications for the company’s reputation and its approach to similar projects in the future.

The case underscores the critical role of legal systems in resolving disputes involving public assets and private investments. The court’s directive for parties to resolve restitution and compensation amicably within a stipulated timeframe is a reminder of the importance of collaboration and compromise in achieving justice.

Moreover, the ruling brings to light issues of governance and transparency in the management of community assets. Analysts have called for stronger oversight mechanisms to prevent similar disputes, emphasizing that clubs and community organizations must ensure robust governance to protect their assets.

As the parties prepare to enter the four-month negotiation phase, the focus shifts to how the club, developers, and other stakeholders will navigate the complexities of compensation and restitution. The outcome of these discussions will not only shape the future of Woodlands Stadium and Lewanika Mall but also set a precedent for managing disputes involving community and commercial interests.

For Lusaka City Club, the road ahead is both challenging and promising. The return of the properties offers a chance to revive its legacy, but success will depend on how effectively it manages its responsibilities under the court’s judgment.

In a city witnessing rapid urban development, the case of Woodlands Stadium and Lewanika Mall serves as a reminder that progress must be underpinned by fairness and accountability. As Lusaka City Club steps into a new chapter, its journey will undoubtedly be watched closely by the community and beyond.

LT

Musokotwane Seeks More Borrowing, Recalls Parliament

43

Musokotwane Seeks More Borrowing, Recalls Parliament

Zambia’s Minister of Finance and National Planning, Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane, has requested the Speaker of the National Assembly to recall Parliament for an urgent session. The aim is to secure approval for additional borrowing to address the growing financial pressures the country is facing. This comes after two supplementary budgets were already sought earlier in the year.

The 2025 national budget, set at ZMW 217.1 billion, represented a 9% increase from 2024. It was designed with ambitious targets, including a projected GDP growth of 6.6%, inflation reduction to between 6% and 8%, and a budget deficit limited to 3.1% of GDP. However, those targets are proving difficult to achieve, as the country grapples with several economic challenges.

The budget was to be financed through domestic revenue of ZMW 174.2 billion, including ZMW 137.4 billion in tax revenue and ZMW 36.8 billion in non-tax revenue, as well as ZMW 8.1 billion in grants from cooperating partners. Borrowing was initially capped at ZMW 34.7 billion to cover the financing gap.

Economic pressures, however, have shifted the landscape. The ongoing effects of a severe drought have disrupted agricultural production, leading to food insecurity and stunted economic growth. This, coupled with the burden of managing Zambia’s significant debt repayments, has created a perfect storm of financial strain. Rising inflation, driven by higher food and fuel prices, has compounded the situation.

Critics of the government’s borrowing strategy argue that continued reliance on external and domestic loans is unsustainable. They point to the need for stricter fiscal discipline and greater transparency in public expenditure. Opposition leaders have also raised concerns about the lack of clarity on how previous loans and supplementary budgets have been utilized, questioning the government’s ability to deliver on its economic promises.

Dr. Musokotwane’s move comes at a time when the country is navigating the impacts of global economic pressures. Rising interest rates and a strengthening US dollar have increased borrowing costs for Zambia, limiting options for fiscal maneuvering. Domestically, the government faces the challenge of balancing social sector spending with investments in infrastructure, all while dealing with limited resources.

The call for Parliament to approve further borrowing underscores the urgency of finding immediate solutions. However, it also raises questions about Zambia’s long-term fiscal sustainability. Observers are closely watching the developments, with expectations that Parliament’s response will set the tone for how the country addresses its economic challenges in the coming months.

As Zambia faces this critical juncture, the pressure is on to implement innovative strategies to stabilize the economy and steer it back toward growth.

Stephenson Mangolwa

Lungu’s Plan B: The Enigma That Will Redefine Zambia’s Democracy

27
Lungu’s Plan B: The Enigma That Will Redefine Zambia’s Democracy
By Dr Mwelwa
The recent decision by Zambia’s Constitutional Court to bar Edgar Chagwa Lungu from contesting in future elections marks a significant moment in the nation’s political history. For critics of Lungu, this ruling might seem like the closing chapter of a political career they have long sought to end. Yet for others, the judgment represents a troubling precedent, raising questions about the independence of institutions and the resilience of Zambia’s democracy. Regardless of where one stands, the implications of this decision extend far beyond the individual; they touch the very fabric of the nation’s democratic foundations.

This ruling is not merely a legal determination; it is a political flashpoint that has revealed the deep fault lines within Zambia’s governance structures. Whether one views Lungu as a polarizing figure or a champion of democracy, there is no denying that this moment reflects the fragility of institutions under the strain of partisan influence. But even as some celebrate and others mourn, a new narrative is emerging one centered on what Lungu has called “Plan B.”

What is Plan B? This is the question that now grips the nation. For Lungu’s critics, it is a source of unease, a reminder that he may not be as politically sidelined as they hoped. For his supporters, it is a rallying cry, a symbol of resilience in the face of what they perceive as systemic injustice. Yet its true nature remains shrouded in mystery, an enigma that both unsettles and inspires.

The court’s ruling has, inadvertently, done more than disqualify Lungu—it has galvanized a movement. Plan B, whatever it may be, is not simply a reaction to the judgment; it is a calculated response designed to challenge the status quo. Those familiar with the principles of political strategy understand that the power of such a plan lies in its ability to remain undefined. By its very ambiguity, Plan B forces both allies and adversaries to grapple with the unknown, creating a strategic advantage that cannot be easily countered.

For critics, this ambiguity is precisely what makes Plan B so unsettling. Is it a legal challenge aimed at reversing the court’s decision? A grassroots mobilization to reshape the political landscape? A new alliance that will upend the existing balance of power? Or is it something entirely different—a strategy that defies conventional political playbooks? The ruling elite, particularly those aligned with the United Party for National Development (UPND), must now contend with these uncertainties, unable to predict or preempt a plan they cannot fully comprehend.

Yet, for all its mystery, Plan B is not just a strategy it is a statement. It speaks to the enduring belief that democracy is not the property of a select few but the birthright of every Zambian. The court’s ruling, whether viewed as a victory for justice or a blow to democracy, has set the stage for a broader reckoning. Plan B is not about one man’s political ambitions; it is about reclaiming the principles that underpin the nation’s governance.

As Zambians reflect on this moment, the questions surrounding Plan B will continue to grow. Will it succeed in challenging the political establishment? Can it restore faith in institutions that many believe have been compromised? And, perhaps most intriguingly, what role will ordinary citizens play in shaping its outcome?

For now, Plan B remains an enigma a source of both intrigue and suspense. Its success will depend not only on its execution but also on its ability to inspire a nation. And as the UPND and its allies grapple with the implications of their victory in court, they must also reckon with the possibility that they have underestimated their adversary. For in their effort to neutralize Lungu, they may have inadvertently ignited a movement that transcends him.

The story of Plan B is still being written. Whether it becomes a footnote in Zambia’s political history or a defining chapter remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the questions it raises and the challenges it poses will shape the nation’s democratic journey for years to come.

Edgar Lungu dribbled by Emmanuel Mwamba and Raphael Nakacinda.

Sixth President ECL has been dribbled in a 90 minute match by the two top scorers in the likes of Emmanuel Mwamba and Raphael Nakacinda.

These two guys are crafty and they have systematically dribbled the Sixth President ECL.

These two guys perceived the future of the former President ECL and dribbled him in such a way by leaving Ukwa Party and join the proxy Tonse Alliance in order to save them selves from the embarrassment and subsequently save in their respective positions while they nurse the loss of the big Man’s political career, and the dashed hope of alebwelelapo projects success.

Why exert so much pressure on the Concourt judges as seen on social media even naming some judges.To me this is uncalled for behavior of desperate people who are some how exhibit the behavior people of Zambia rejected through the 2021 elections.

And after realizing that the sixth President ECL has no vision for the country,as each time he opens up the mouth as seen in campaigns and even when addressing his supporters,no alternative solutions has ever been offered by the Sixth President ECL apart from criticizing the government of the day.

The guys have noticed that the sole purpose of Opposition to offer checks and balances is not up to the game.
Even as things have not gone well with the Sixth President ECL concerning the landmark Con court judgment , these two guys remain in their respective positions currently and slowly continue to deceive the Man that he can still be a shadow President just as they previously did with Honourable Mundubile and play the don’t kubeba.

Honestly how could the Sixth President ECL be lured into jumping from Ukwa to Tonse Alliance and be a President of a party on paper and media,I mean the party without even a councilor and an MP.. What a miscalculation.

Even if Tonse Alliance has let’s assume 20 MPs can that number produce a President and unseat the current President and government in power,be honest and serious about national matters.

So these two guys know very well that Dr ECL is not sellable and an attractive candidate except to the blind few, moved by kasaka kandalama.

The unsatiable appetite for power and desperation of the sixth President ECL paved way for manipulation.Where are the political strongholds for Tonse Alliance? None apart from being on paper and media.

The concerned Citizens spoke and advised you sir to reflect on the comeback decision, out of love, with love and for the good of the man.We fully understand that it’s your constitutional rights to participate in any elections but done with reality and truth.People can deceive and manipulate when they see a weakness.

I always say “If men can promote you,then the same can bring you down”

Tiyende Pamodzi dimutima wumo, people can sing this song with you and you believe them yet they are far away from you, they don’t mean the song,form and meaning.

This is a good case study for current and future politicians that aspire for high office.Learn to listen to people you least regard and despise, for Wisdom is far from intellectualism.A good leader is a good listener and always seek wisdom and when he finds it he treasures it.

By Pastor M.Ching’andu

Citizens Have a Duty To Respect Decisions Of The Courts Of Law- LAZ

56

Citizens have a duty to respect decisions of the duly constituted courts of law: LAZ reaction to the constitutional court Judgement in the Eligibitlity case of Michelo Chizombe v Edgar Chagwa Lungu and others 2023/CCZ/0021

The Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) has closely monitored the developments surrounding the eligibility case of Michelo Chizombe vs. Edgar Chagwa Lungu and Others -2023/CCZ/0021 before the Constitutional Court. We acknowledge the significant public interest generated by this case,including the Judgment delivered today by the Court.

By its Judgment, the Constitutional Court determined that Mr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu, the 1st Respondent is ineligible to contest any future elections having served two terms as President. This decision marks a departure from the Court’s earlier decision on the matter, specifically in the cases of Daniel Pule and Others vs Attorney General and Others, Bampi Aubrey Kapalasa and Another vs. The Attorney General and Legal Resources Foundation vs. Edgar Lungu and the Attorney General.

While we express concern about the potential risks of fluctuating decisions of an apex Court, which can invariably undermine public confidence in the Judiciary, LAZ firmly believes that the decision of the Constitutional Court must be respected by all citizens.

Under Part 8 of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2016, the Supreme law of the land given unto ourselves as citizens, judicial authority of the Republic which is derived from the people of Zambia is reposed in the courts of law, who have a final say on all mattes of legal interpretation.

It is, therefore, the duty of the Constitutional Court to settle disputes relating to interpretation of the Constitution. Having discharged its duty, in the eligibility case of Michelo Chizombe vs. Edgar Chagwa Lungu and Others -2023/CCZ/0021, all citizens have a corresponding duty to respect the court decision.

The foundation of our democracy lies in the respect citizens show for institutions of governance that we have collectively created for ourselves, such as the courts of law.

At the same time, in line with Article 118 of the Constitution, we strongly remind the Judiciary to ensure that judicial power is exercised in a just and fair manner. We trust that such an approach will foster accountability and preserve the public confidence that is essential to the integrity of the Judiciary.The press release on a matter of national interest, in defense of constitutionalism has been issued in furtherance of LAZ’s mandate under Section 4 of the Law Association of Zambia Act No 31 of the Laws of Zambia.

Lungisani Zulu
PRESIDENT

Edgar Lungu’s Defiant Reaction to Court Ruling- Plan B

52

Edgar Lungu, Zambia’s former president, fiercely condemned the Constitutional Court’s decision barring him from the 2026 elections. In his social media post, he accused the judiciary of being manipulated by political forces, prioritizing partisan interests over constitutional integrity. Lungu pointed to the strategic reshuffling of judges, claiming it was orchestrated to guarantee a pre-determined outcome.

He boldly activated “Plan B”, pledging a legal and political fight to restore democracy. Lungu vowed that true power lies with the people, not with a few ruling elites, and he insisted that Zambia’s democracy would ultimately prevail. His post sent a clear message: Zambia’s political battle is far from over, and democracy’s future will be shaped by the determination of its citizens. below is his Post word for word from his facebook page

MY RESPONSE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGEMENT TODAY

Ladies and gentlemen of our beloved nation, esteemed members of the press, fellow patriots, and all who hold dear the principles of justice and constitutional democracy:

We find ourselves at a critical juncture in our nation’s history, a moment marked by deep reflection and, I dare say, a profound sense of our common identity and destiny. The verdict rendered today was expected. For months, the hands of political manipulation have, with undeniable force, steered us toward a conclusion foreseen not by the merits of reasoned argument or constitutional fidelity but by the weight of orchestrated design and political machinations. We kept on monitoring this!

To understand the gravity of this moment, we must revisit the sequence of events that brought us here. It began with a petition that sought to exclude me from the political arena—not through the natural verdict of the people on the ballot paper, but by the calculated intervention of political forces sponsored by political players. It unfolded with the reshaping of our Constitutional Court, the displacement of arbiters of justice, and the narrowing of judicial voices to fit a predetermined script.

Yes, specific judges were expelled in order to retain specific judges specifically for today’s judgment! We saw decisions cloaked in procedural justifications concocted by that same unmistakable hand of expediency. Judges were removed, some silenced, others promoted, and the very architecture of our judiciary reshaped to align with partisan imperatives. Of course, we all witnessed calculated judicial reshuffles by politicians for their plane to land here today.

And so, you have heard for yourselves, the verdict has been issued, declaring that my eligibility to stand in the 2026 elections is nullified by the weight of the court’s decision. I accept this verdict. I accept it not with resignation but with resolve. This is because this verdict transcends the fate of Edgar Chagwa Lungu. It speaks to the erosion of judicial independence, the weakening of our democratic foundations, and the weaponisation of our institutions for short-term gain.

But, my fellow countrymen and women, know this: from this blatant manipulation and disenfranchisement, a new resolve is born. Democracy, my fellow citizens, is not merely a system of governance but the lifeblood of our national identity. And therefore today, I declare that Plan B has been set in motion and Plan B shall legally fight to defeat and win for Zambians. Trust me, I in the spirit of democracy and Zambians shall win in and with Plan B!

This is not a retreat. It is not surrender. It is a recalibration of our efforts towards the sacred task of strengthening our democratic path. Plan B is rooted in the principle that democracy must prevail as a reality for every citizen of this land. Plan B is based on the enduring ideal that power must always reside with the people. Plan B will prove that no machination can extinguish the power of the Zambian people and that institutions must serve the public, not the ambitions of a few.

Let me assure you, I am filled not with bitterness but with renewed determination, political hope and faith that democracy, not court politics shall certainly win in 2026 without any doubt. We must show the world that Zambia’s democracy cannot be extinguished by a manipulated verdict. Zambians shall win and celebrate very soon, not few ruling elites through their proxies!

To those who believe they have triumphed today, I say this: history is a patient judge. The true verdict will be rendered not in the chambers of a court but in the hearts of the people of Zambia, and the annals of time.

My fellow Zambians, let us walk forward together with dignity and resolve. Let us prove that our democracy, though tested in this moment, will emerge stronger.

Today, Plan B goes into motion and democracy will prevail as well as win! Thank you, and may God bless our beloved Zambia.

Edgar Changwa Lungu
Sixth President of Zambia
PF President and Tonse Alliance 2026 Presidential Candidate

Edgar Lungu Ineligible for 2026 Elections: A Reflection on Legal Oversights and Finality

49

Today, Zambia witnessed a pivotal judicial moment as the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) delivered its final judgment, declaring former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu ineligible to contest the 2026 elections. This decision has sent ripples across the nation, invoking both relief and outrage among different factions of the populace. The ruling underscores key legal errors made in the past, demands acceptance of the outcome, and forces the nation to confront its judicial history with sobering clarity.

The core of the judgment lies in acknowledging significant mistakes made by the ConCourt and the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) in the 2021 elections. Lungu’s candidacy in that election, while accepted at the time, was based on flawed legal interpretations and administrative oversights. ConCourt’s earlier rulings validated his nomination and ECZ’s acceptance of his qualification documents. Yet, today’s ruling implicitly admits these were made “per incuriam” legal decisions rendered without full consideration of the relevant facts or law.

Despite the errors leading to Lungu’s candidacy, the ConCourt has emphasized that the 2021 elections remain legally and constitutionally valid. This means there is no ground for a by-election, as the elections were not rendered void by today’s decision. For better or worse, Zambians must now live with the consequences of the judiciary’s past missteps.

The court’s ruling today reflects an evolution in its understanding of the Constitution, marking a departure from its earlier stance. However, the judgment avoided tackling the doctrine of res judicata the principle that once a matter has been judicially decided, it should not be reopened. Critics note that failing to address how the court departed from its previous decisions raises questions about consistency and legal finality.

Furthermore, the issue of locus standi the legal standing of the petitioner to bring the case—was left unaddressed. Observers have questioned why other presidential candidates from the 2021 elections were not part of this petition, a point that could have influenced the case’s scope and perceived impartiality.

Today’s ruling, while contentious, is unequivocally final. By declaring Lungu ineligible for 2026 but eligible in 2021, the court effectively admitted its own error while signaling a willingness to correct course. Zambians are now urged to accept the decision and move forward, with the understanding that the judiciary has reached its ultimate conclusion on this matter.

This judgment sends a message about the limitations of legal systems and the fallibility of even the highest courts. For supporters of the ruling, it marks a step toward safeguarding constitutional principles and ensuring leadership rotation. For critics, it highlights judicial inconsistencies that risk undermining public confidence in Zambia’s democratic institutions.

Today’s ruling on Edgar Lungu’s eligibility is as much a reckoning with the past as it is a statement about the future. While the decision closes one chapter in Zambia’s political history, it opens new discussions about the role of judicial accountability, electoral integrity, and constitutional clarity. Moving forward, the nation must grapple with these lessons to build a more robust democratic framework.

Clive Habeenzu

A Nation at a Crossroads, How the ConCourt’s Decision Shapes Zambia’s Future

Today’s ruling regarding former President Edgar Lungu’s eligibility for the 2026 Zambian presidential elections has sparked significant controversy across the nation. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) upheld Lungu’s eligibility for the 2021 elections but has now barred him from running in 2026, leading to accusations of inconsistency and disillusionment among many Zambians. This decision has ignited a heated debate about judicial independence, the clarity of the Constitution, and the concerning precedent it sets for the country.

While the court aimed to tackle a crucial constitutional issue, its ruling has generated more questions than answers. If Lungu was deemed eligible to run in 2021 after serving two terms, how can the same Constitution now deem him ineligible for 2026? Even a child would struggle to understand the reasoning. Critics contend that this ruling was strategically designed to prevent the invalidation of the 2021 general elections. Declaring him ineligible for 2021 could have led to a constitutional crisis, potentially nullifying the election results and throwing the country into turmoil with demands for a new election.

This case has also revealed significant flaws within Zambia’s judiciary. The frequent reshuffling of judges, including the alleged dismissal of three Constitutional Court justices by President Hakainde Hichilema, has raised concerns about the judiciary’s independence. The current bench, which has been restructured with judges reportedly appointed or promoted by the current administration, faces accusations of being used as a political instrument.

This isn’t the first time Lungu’s eligibility has come under scrutiny. The issue has been examined and resolved multiple times, including in the notable Danny Pule & Others, Aubrey Bampi Kapalasa, and Sishuwa Sishuwa cases. Each time, the conclusion was the same: Lungu’s partial term following Michael Sata’s death did not count as a full term. Yet, despite these rulings, the question of eligibility has been reopened again and again, with critics accusing the judiciary of playing to the whims of the Executive.

The UPND’s handling of this case may have been a strategic misstep. By barring Lungu in 2026, the ruling has reignited political tensions and potentially bolstered opposition unity. Some political analysts argue that today’s decision was designed to limit Lungu’s political influence while avoiding the fallout of overturning the 2021 elections. However, this maneuver may have backfired, as it has opened the UPND to accusations of judicial manipulation and undermining democratic institutions.

President Hichilema’s perceived willingness to sacrifice the independence of institutions like the judiciary, Parliament, and the Electoral Commission to achieve political goals has not gone unnoticed. Such actions risk eroding public confidence in Zambia’s democracy, leaving citizens to wonder: if even the highest court in the land cannot be trusted, where does one turn for justice?

The ConCourt’s decision, rather than settling the matter, seems to have marked the beginning of an endless cycle of petitions and counter-petitions. The judiciary’s inability to deliver a clear, definitive resolution has turned it into a circus, running like a headless chicken and drawing widespread criticism. Respect for judicial authority is eroding, as many believe the institution has failed to respect itself.

“Respect the judiciary,” people say. But how can citizens respect an entity that appears to contradict its own decisions and allow itself to be used as a political pawn?

Today’s choreographed ruling has not only complicated Zambia’s political landscape but also reshuffled opportunities in the opposition camp. With Lungu out of the picture for 2026, the race for leadership within the Patriotic Front (PF) has intensified, creating an unpredictable and volatile political environment.

The broader implications for Zambia’s democracy are concerning. The ConCourt’s ruling sets a precedent for revisiting final judgments, which could lead to an endless cycle of litigation over constitutional matters. This erodes judicial authority and creates uncertainty in the political arena, undermining the stability needed for national development.

Zambia finds itself at a critical juncture. The judiciary, once the cornerstone of justice, is now viewed with suspicion. Political leaders must recognize the damage caused by undermining democratic institutions and work toward restoring public trust. For the judiciary, the task is to reclaim its credibility by upholding its independence and delivering judgments free from political interference.

For now, however, the question of Edgar Lungu’s eligibility and the broader issues of judicial integrity and democratic governance remains a cloud hanging over Zambia’s future. The dust has not settled; if anything, it has been stirred up, leaving Zambians to grapple with the consequences of today’s decision.

Moses Haansimuna
Legal Analyst, Political Commentator, Investigative Journalist, Public Affairs Specialist
Austria

Lungu won’t be on the ballot in 2026 but unemployment and poverty

46

You can’t spend five years in government lamenting your predecessor’s misrule hoping this strategy will insulate you from sharp scrutiny in the next election cycle. The focus on former President Edgar Lungu is hideous and so is the outcome of today’s verdict on his eligibility to contest the next Presidential elections.

How did we even get here? Lungu who was resoundingly humiliated at the polls three years ago and was effectively staring into his political sunset is now perilously close to achieving political martyrdom.Blame it on the ruling UPND, this government is way too enamoured with his political relevance and governance record that it has unconsciously taken its eyes off the most pertinent issues facing the country. As such, snuffing him off his political oxygen through all manner of machinations and trickery has only elevated his standing.

Alongside today’s verdict on his eligibility to contest the 2026 Presidential elections, the integrity of our Judiciary is also on trial. What is concerning is that our judiciary has not only abandoned all pretence of constitutional delinquency but has made its disregard for the rule of law a fundamental part of its character. One is left wondering, what has happened to the seemingly infallible Mumba Malila? He was elevated to the Chief Justice position to cleanse political cobwebs from the Judiciary. But has Malila lived up to this expectation or has himself become a cobweb? This morning’s verdict will tell.

So, will government’s elimination of one of its biggest rivals from the 2026 Presidential contest achieve anything? Nothing, absolutely nothing. There will be honking and high fives flying in the corridors of power after the verdict is passed but these celebrations will be short-lived. Truth is and Just like the 2021 polls, Lungu won’t be on the ballot but poverty, unemployment, rising cost of living including load and water shedding. These rate as the biggest threats to the UPND’s political fortunes than Lungu.

Dangers of fiddling with the Judiciary

Does the UPND realise just how much today’s Constitutional court ruling will impact its electoral fortunes, and the goodwill bestowed on the party post the 2021 polls? President Hakainde Hichilema’s ascendancy to plot one was a pure breeze. With it came lofty expectations from an electorate that was weary of corruption, unemployment, high food prices and poverty. His biggest pledge while in the opposition was that he would deal decisively with unemployment, poverty and corruption. He also committed to deliver a Judiciary that would be free from interference by the executive. Has he
delivered on these promises? Your guess is as good as mine.

Back to the Constitutional court, an established doctrine is that a ruling by this court becomes a legal precedent. Can somebody explain the difference to Lungu’s case then? You see, there are a few lessons to pick up from the recent electoral outcomes in the US. The outcome were a stark warning of how weaponisation of the justice system can birth an anti-democratic establishment. While we may successfully bar the former President from contesting the next elections, we need to be mindful of the consequences. Unlike Lungu whose blemishes are widely documented and could have struggled to
beat President Hakainde Hichilema in a rematch, the alternative for the opposition might be an even worse prospect to our democracy.

Another pertinent question. Has this leadership succeeded in delivering on its pledges? It’s not so much that it has spectacularly failed to rise to the challenges confronting the country but the boorishness with which this government has defended corruption and other misdemeanours committed by the Judiciary is astonishing. For many an independent pundit, today’s verdict is a brazen departure from our Judiciary’s established legal principles. And while true that the PF was
unapologetically corrupt, President Hichilema can’t be fixated on chasing Lungu’s shadow while his own officials are plundering the country’s wealth in broad day light.

Is corruption is stealing HH’s promise?

For context, let’s digress a bit. We do not know Diego Cassilis from a bar of soap but those who attest to his business acumen have endorsed his opinion that corruption which is now endemic in Zambia is costing the country its lustre as an investment destination. Now, whether Cassilis’s pronouncement is born out of a possible squeeze in business opportunities or genuine concerns about the country’s economic trajectory is debatable.

But what is indisputable is that the court of public opinion has become a jungle – more so in this era of social media. There are no laws, etiquette or decency whatsoever. Perception is the lodestar. This phenomenon is understandable. As humans, we are naturally inclined to operate not on reality but on our perception of reality. If it quarks, it’s a duck. If it’s got a long neck, it’s a giraffe, if it roars, it’s a lion.

And if it’s sung by Casillis who is known to have plot one’s ear, then the corruption allegations ring true. Add to this equation, the voices of disenchanted youth who are crumbling under the weight of a devastating socio-economic crisis, the electorate is surely twiddling its fingers in anticipation of 2026.Don’t’ forget, three years into its reign, the UPND has riled a significant number of its most ardent supporters, the clergy, politicians who served in the previous dispensation including the business community. The former President has effectively managed to coalesce this group of the walking wounded by transposing their ideals and suffering to his own cause.

In their world, they see in Lungu an apparent larger than life saviour who is on a mission to liberate them from socio-economic and political bondage. Their fortunes are hinged on his political survival.After today’s ruling, will he go quietly and carry with him the PF, UKA and the Tonse Alliance’s political ambitions into oblivion, or will he hold his ground to fight another day? This is politics. If a week can be lifetime, what of two years? I doubt we have head the last of Lungu.

By Chimwemwe Mwanza

PF Faction Leader Condemns Restriction of Public Access to Edgar Lungu’s Eligibility Judgment

PF Faction Leader Condemns Restriction of Public Access to Edgar Lungu’s Eligibility Judgment

Raphael Nakacinda, the Secretary General of a faction within the Patriotic Front (PF), has strongly opposed the decision made by Inspector General of Police Grapheal Musamba and the judiciary to restrict public attendance at the upcoming court session for Edgar Lungu’s eligibility case, which is set for judgment on December 10, 2024. Nakacinda contends that no Zambian law prohibits citizens from attending court proceedings, viewing this decision as an unjustified breach of legal norms that erodes the foundation of the rule of law.

He has also sharply criticized Chief Justice Mumba Malila, accusing the Chief Justice of acting beyond his jurisdiction by permitting the live broadcasting of court proceedings. Nakacinda argues that such a decision should only be made after the necessary legislative amendments, rather than by unilateral judicial action. He believes that the Chief Justice should have waited for the legal framework to be updated before taking such matters into his own hands, underscoring a perceived disregard for the established judicial process.

Amid these tensions, Nakacinda’s stance highlights broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and the independence of Zambia’s judicial system. There is a growing debate among political observers and legal experts about the balance of authority between law enforcement bodies and the judiciary, and how decisions made by these institutions impact public trust in legal and political institutions

HOTFM Zambia

Church Calls for Peace Ahead of Kawambwa By-Elections

Church Calls for Peace Ahead of Kawambwa By-Elections

St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Kawambwa has made a strong call for a peaceful and respectful atmosphere as Zambia prepares for the upcoming by-elections scheduled for December 20, 2024. In a significant message delivered during Sunday mass, Parish Priest Father Kunda Kashinga urged all political parties to set aside their differences and refrain from any acts of political violence. Instead, he emphasized the need to focus on constructive campaigns that reflect respect and mutual cooperation.

Father Kashinga’s call aligns with ongoing national efforts to ensure that Zambia’s electoral processes are free from disturbances and intimidation. Electoral campaigns have previously been marred by challenges such as clashes among party supporters, intimidation, and calls for accountability. His message underscores the commitment to protecting Zambia’s democratic values and ensuring a transparent electoral process.

During his sermon, Father Kashinga also addressed the local electorate, urging them to exercise their right to vote in a responsible and informed manner. Voters should prioritize merit and commitment to community development when choosing candidates. His caution against electoral malpractice and violence serves as a reminder that a legitimate election depends on honesty and transparency.

Father Kashinga stressed the importance of the church’s role as a partner in social development rather than a political opponent. Churches across Zambia have historically been instrumental in community initiatives, working alongside government institutions and NGOs to address social issues like education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. Father Kashinga called on political leaders to view the church as an ally in national development, committed to the well-being of citizens without compromising neutrality.

Zambia’s commitment to peaceful elections and a transparent democratic process is not only about political integrity but also about ensuring a stable society where development and democracy coexist. Previous electoral events in the country have shown the necessity of cooperation among political parties, community leaders, and institutions to maintain social harmony and national stability.

Organizations such as the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) and various civil society groups have also consistently emphasized the importance of adherence to electoral laws and the protection of voters’ rights. Their efforts reinforce the need for political campaigns to remain respectful and inclusive, focusing on national interests rather than individual or party gains.

As the Kawambwa community approaches the by-elections, Father Kashinga’s message serves as a vital reminder to all stakeholders that peace, democracy, and development go hand in hand. Upholding peaceful electoral practices will be a significant step in strengthening trust in Zambia’s democratic processes and ensuring a brighter future for its citizens.

Father Kashinga’s appeal highlights the collective responsibility of political players, religious leaders, and citizens to work together to achieve national progress. A stable electoral environment will not only secure democratic legitimacy but also pave the way for greater community development, economic growth, and social cohesion across Zambia.