Hon. Jack Mwiimbu’s Hollow Assurance of Peaceful 2026 Elections An Insult to Zambians

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

The recent assurance by Home Affairs Minister Hon. Jack Mwiimbu that Zambia will have peaceful elections in 2026 is not only misleading but an outright insult to the intelligence of Zambians. How can anyone promise a credible and peaceful election when the very institution responsible for overseeing the electoral process, the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ), is being run by known UPND sympathizers and cadres?

The integrity of any democratic election hinges on the neutrality and independence of the electoral body. However, under the UPND administration, the ECZ has been strategically packed with individuals whose loyalty is not to the Zambian people, but to the ruling party. The most glaring examples include ECZ Chairperson Madam Mwangala Zaloumis and Commissioner Macdonald Chipenzi both of whom have well-documented ties to the UPND. How can Zambians trust an electoral commission that is effectively an extension of the ruling party?

Madam Zaloumis, a known UPND ally, is expected to oversee an election that should be free, fair, and credible. This is the same individual who has consistently aligned with the ruling party’s agenda, raising serious questions about her ability to administer an impartial electoral process. Similarly, Chipenzi, another UPND loyalist, has a track record of openly supporting the ruling party’s political narratives. The presence of such individuals at the helm of the ECZ makes a mockery of Zambia’s democracy and undermines public confidence in the electoral process.

The assurance of peaceful elections is hollow when the playing field is already being tilted in favor of the ruling party. We have already witnessed the increasing abuse of state institutions to target opposition members, the restriction of political freedoms, and the selective application of the law to silence dissent. These are the telltale signs of an electoral process that is being rigged long before the first vote is cast.

If Madam Zaloumis and Macdonald Chipenzi had any aota of decency, the best they can do is resign. A lot of concerned stakeholders have stated their disapproval of them heading that institution by stating that they are full card-carrying members of the UPND party. Their continued stay in office further erodes public trust and calls into question the credibility of the upcoming elections.

For Hon. Mwiimbu to claim that the 2026 elections will be peaceful while ignoring the glaring partisanship within the ECZ is an insult to every Zambian who believes in true democracy. Peaceful elections are not determined by mere words but by a fair and just process. Without an independent ECZ, free political participation, and equal application of the law, Zambia is on a dangerous path toward a predetermined outcome that will only serve the interests of the ruling party.

If the UPND government is genuinely committed to peace and democracy, it must begin by depoliticizing the ECZ. Let independent professionals, not party loyalists, oversee Zambia’s elections. Until that happens, Hon. Mwiimbu’s promises of peace in 2026 are nothing but empty rhetoric designed to pacify Zambians while the UPND tightens its grip on power.

Zambians must demand true electoral reforms now before it is too late. The future of our democracy depends on it

Laura Miti Criticizes Government Appointments: “How Can He Be So Bad at Hiring and Firing?”

Governance activist Laura Miti has voiced her frustration over what she sees as a decline in the quality of government appointments in Zambia. In a Facebook post, Miti reflected on past administrations, comparing their leadership choices to the current system, which she believes prioritizes party loyalty over competence.

One thing I miss about the MMD administration from Chiluba down to RB is the quality of just about everyone appointed to high office. OK, there were one or two iffy Ministers, especially those overseeing the Copperbelt, and a couple of Vice Presidents that we should thank God were fired before they could pyana. In the main, though, you could not argue with the deservedness of Ministers, PSes, and Presidential advisers.

Miti acknowledged that while the MMD era had its shortcomings, it generally ensured that those in high office were capable of handling their roles. She suggested that this approach has faded over time, particularly after Rupiah Banda’s presidency.

Vabwela vachinja. Since RB—awee mwandi—ba Katekas bamachita chabe piki piki na pikidoli among loyalists, with the main requirement for office seemingly being that loyalty or longevity in the party.

She went further to say that many people in important government positions today do not seem to have clear roles or meaningful contributions, raising concerns that some jobs exist solely as rewards for party members.

So many people of no identifiable use to the country are in offices critical to its running. Some of the positions almost certainly created with the sole purpose of rewarding people with jobs.

Miti also expressed disappointment in President Hakainde Hichilema, saying that given his corporate background, one would expect a more professional and results-driven approach to appointments.

On that count, the current President is the most disappointing for me. I mean, corporate background and all. How can he be so bad at hiring and firing, or so at ease with incompetence?

Her post will draw attention, especially from those who share concerns about the state of leadership in Zambia. While government appointments have always been a subject of discussion, Miti’s remarks highlight the growing expectation for leadership that prioritizes ability over political ties.

Whether these concerns will lead to any changes in how appointments are made remains to be seen.

By Lucasensio Zulu

The recent walkout by United Party for National Development (UPND) Members of Parliament (MPs) during a parliamentary debate on the high cost of living has sparked widespread discussion and debate across Zambia. While some have criticized the move as an avoidance tactic, others view it as a strategic stand to prioritize the urgent needs of citizens over political point-scoring. To fully understand the context and implications of this action, it is essential to examine the motivations behind the walkout, the legacy of past economic mismanagement, and the UPND government’s ongoing efforts to address the economic challenges facing the nation.

The walkout by UPND MPs has been interpreted in various ways. Some see it as a bold statement of solidarity with Zambians struggling under the weight of rising living costs, while others view it as a refusal to engage in a debate perceived as politically charged. The opposition, led by Patriotic Front (PF) MP Mutotwe Kafwaya, had raised a motion urging the government to take practical steps to reduce the cost of living. However, UPND MPs argued that the debate was being manipulated for political gain rather than fostering constructive dialogue.

The walkout can be seen as a symbolic act of protest against what the UPND MPs viewed as a lack of sincerity in addressing the economic crisis. By refusing to participate in what they deemed a politicized debate, the MPs aimed to draw attention to the need for genuine, solution-oriented discussions. However, this move has also raised questions about leadership accountability, particularly regarding the role of the Chief Whip, who has faced scrutiny for the decision. Some have called for the Chief Whip to be relieved of his duties to underscore UPND’s commitment to accountability and effective governance.

The current economic challenges Zambia faces cannot be divorced from the legacy of the previous PF administration. Under their tenure, the country witnessed widespread corruption, mismanagement of public funds, and inflated infrastructure costs, all of which severely undermined economic stability. Key issues included:

The PF era was marked by rampant corruption, with government officials frequently engaging in corrupt practices with impunity. This eroded public trust in governmental institutions and diverted resources from critical sectors.

Numerous financial scandals, including negligent procurement practices, drained the national coffers and compromised the quality of essential services.

Infrastructure projects were often characterized by inflated costs, raising suspicions of financial impropriety and kickbacks. This misallocation of resources exacerbated the nation’s economic woes.

These systemic issues left the UPND government with an economy in disarray upon assuming office. The high cost of living, rising fuel prices, and increasing mealie meal costs are direct consequences of this mismanagement, compounded by external factors such as global economic instability.

In response to these challenges, the UPND government has implemented several strategic measures aimed at stabilizing the economy and fostering sustainable growth. Key initiatives include:

 The government has sought assistance from the IMF to restore fiscal discipline, restructure debt, and implement reforms to promote economic recovery.

The UPND has been actively engaged in negotiations to restructure the debt inherited from the PF administration. This aims to alleviate the financial burden and create a conducive environment for economic growth.

The revitalization of the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) has been a cornerstone of UPND’s strategy. By empowering local communities, the government has facilitated numerous success stories, such as infrastructure improvements at Mbinga Primary School in Chadiza District and the expansion of business ventures by the Chizombo Women’s Club in Zambezi District.

The government has taken steps to stabilize fuel prices and increase support for farmers through subsidies and fertilizer distribution. These measures are expected to boost food production and lower mealie meal prices in the long term.

While the opposition has a crucial role in holding the government accountable, their approach has often been criticized for prioritizing political point-scoring over constructive solutions. The walkout by UPND MPs can be seen as a response to what they perceived as a lack of genuine intent to address the economic crisis. However, this incident also highlights the need for bipartisan cooperation and meaningful dialogue to tackle the pressing economic challenges facing Zambia.

The cost of living affects everyone, and addressing it requires more than political blame games. It demands tangible economic strategies, expanded social protection programs, and enhanced public communication to ensure that government efforts are effectively conveyed to the populace. The UPND government has demonstrated its commitment to addressing these issues through its economic interventions, but the road to recovery is long and requires collective effort.

The UPND government’s walkout from Parliament, while controversial, underscores its commitment to prioritizing the urgent needs of Zambians over political theatrics. The economic challenges facing the nation are deeply rooted in the mismanagement and corruption of the previous administration, but the UPND is taking decisive steps to address these issues. Through transparent governance, strategic economic reforms, and community-driven development, Zambia is on a path to sustainable recovery and prosperity.

However, meaningful change requires more than government action; it demands a collective effort from all stakeholders, including the opposition, civil society, and citizens. By fostering constructive dialogue and focusing on solutions rather than blame, Zambia can overcome its economic challenges and build a brighter future for all. As the late President Levy Mwanawasa and Fredrick Chiluba (RIP) once asked, “Are we ready to sacrifice?” The answer lies in our ability to work together towards a common goal of economic stability and growth.

Zambia’s Suspension of 15% Export Duty on Precious Stones: Economic Impact and Expert Reactions

Lusaka, Zambia – The suspension of the 15% export duty on precious stones and metals in Zambia has elicited divergent views and reactions, with economic experts, business leaders, and political commentators analyzing its impact on Zambia’s gemstone industry, foreign investment, and local entrepreneurship.

On February 18, 2025, Finance Minister Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane issued Statutory Instrument No. 4 of 2025, effectively suspending the export duty. The move was justified as an effort to make Zambia’s gemstone sector more competitive globally while ensuring a stable investment climate. However, this decision has drawn sharp criticism from certain quarters, particularly those advocating for greater local participation in the gemstone trade.

Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka’s Concerns

Among the many voices is former Economic Association of Zambia (EAZ) President, Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka, who in a detailed statement lamented that Zambia remains the world’s largest exporter of emeralds yet continues to reap minimal benefits from the sector due to the overwhelming dominance of foreign firms. He pointed out that, historically, local involvement in the trade has been minimal, with Zambians mostly engaging in the illicit trade of gemstones stolen from established mines and sold at low prices to foreign buyers.

“The gemstone industry is highly capital-intensive, and without generational wealth, Zambians have been largely excluded from meaningful participation,” Haabazoka wrote. “Meanwhile, foreign companies and individuals have amassed billions of dollars from our resources. Ideally, the government, with its financial muscle, should have empowered capable Zambians to enter this industry or mandated ZCCM to take charge on behalf of the nation.”

Haabazoka also alleged that international mining firms have historically used auctions abroad as a loophole to underdeclare sales values and avoid paying corporate income tax. To counter this, the Zambian government previously mandated local auctions, but compliance from mining firms remained low. The introduction of the 15% export duty on gemstones was meant to ensure Zambia benefitted from its resources, but it was met with resistance from the industry.

“These companies then began announcing work stoppages and suspending mining activities, essentially blackmailing the government. Now, it seems their lobbying efforts have paid off,” he argued.

Haabazoka further questioned why the government listens to foreign businesses but disregards the struggles of local entrepreneurs, noting that small businesses continue to face high taxes, rising business operation fees, and limited government support. “Personal income tax remains high, discouraging companies from offering better salaries and reducing disposable income for the ordinary Zambian. We must find a formula to create wealth for ourselves instead of making decisions that only benefit outsiders,” he added.

Dickson Jere’s Take: Government Yielding to Foreign Pressure?

Renowned lawyer and political commentator, Dickson Jere, also weighed in, questioning whether the suspension of the export duty on precious stones was a result of undue foreign pressure. Jere argued that while the government may see the move as a way to sustain the sector, it risks setting a precedent where foreign firms can threaten economic disruptions to push for favorable policies.

“This decision raises serious questions about Zambia’s sovereignty over its own resources. If the justification is that investors were threatening to leave, then what happens next? Will we keep giving in to their demands at every turn?” Jere remarked.

He pointed out that despite Zambia’s rich gemstone reserves, the country continues to struggle with revenue generation and economic development because of lenient policies favoring multinational firms. Jere suggested that the government should have instead engaged stakeholders to find alternative solutions that do not involve waiving critical revenue streams.

Jito Kayumba’s Defense of the Government’s Decision

On the other hand, Special Assistant to the President on Finance and Investments, Jito Kayumba, defended the government’s move, arguing that the tax was having unintended negative consequences, including making Zambian gemstones less competitive and discouraging investment.

“In policy-making, we must consider both revenue collection and the sustainability of an industry. The 15% export duty on gemstones was introduced with good intentions, but it inadvertently stifled investment and pushed traders to find ways around the system. Instead of maximizing tax revenue, it led to decreased exports and reduced government income in the long run,” Kayumba stated.

He also dismissed claims that the government was favoring foreign businesses, explaining that international investors provide much-needed capital and expertise in the Zambian gemstone industry. According to him, without policies that attract and retain investors, Zambia risks losing out on long-term benefits such as job creation, infrastructure development, and skills transfer.

“The government is not here to punish businesses. We want an industry that thrives, creates jobs, and contributes to the economy. This suspension is a necessary step to achieve that,” Kayumba asserted.

Views on Zambia’s Economic Policy

The suspension of the 15% export duty on precious stones has reignited broader discussions about Zambia’s economic policies, especially regarding taxation, foreign investment, and local entrepreneurship. Some analysts warn that Zambia’s over-reliance on foreign mining firms poses long-term economic risks, while others argue that stringent tax policies could drive investors away and stifle growth.

With local business owners feeling the weight of high taxes and stringent regulations, there is growing pressure on the government to implement policies that not only attract investment but also empower Zambians to have a stronger stake in their country’s wealth.

As divergent views continue, one question lingers: Who truly benefits from Zambia’s rich gemstone resources – the country and its citizens or foreign investors? The answer will largely depend on how the government navigates this delicate balancing act in the coming months.

President Hakainde Hichilema has reiterated his administration’s commitment to implementing reforms aimed at driving economic growth and creating jobs, emphasizing the critical role of the private sector in achieving these goals.

Speaking during the third Private Sector Day Re-Run Meeting held in Lusaka today, President Hichilema, whose speech was delivered by Vice President Mutale Nalumango, highlighted the importance of listening to the concerns of the private sector to design effective policies.

“Our administration is dedicated to reducing business costs and improving the ease of doing business in Zambia. This can only be achieved through the full participation of the private sector, women, and the youth in our national development agenda,” the President stated.

The event, organized under the theme “Embracing Sustainability: Unlocking Economic Opportunities in the Face of Climate Change and Drought,” brought together key stakeholders to discuss strategies for fostering a stronger partnership between the public and private sectors.

Key Highlights from the Forum:

Strengthening Public-Private Partnerships:
The Public-Private Dialogue Forum (PPDF), launched on April 27, 2022, serves as a structured platform for inclusive engagement on policy matters. The forum aims to drive innovation, job creation, investment, and economic growth through impactful reforms.

Climate Resilience and Green Growth:
In response to the severe drought experienced during the last rainy season, which adversely affected the energy, water, and agriculture sectors, the government is prioritizing climate resilience. This includes policy reforms and strategic investments in green growth initiatives.

Debt Restructuring Success:
Government efforts to restructure debt have created a fiscal space of $4.7 billion between 2022 and 2024. Without this restructuring, debt servicing would have consumed nearly the entire K217.1 billion budget for 2025.

Rural Electrification and Energy Sustainability:
The government is implementing 62 rural electrification projects, including 19 solar mini-grids, with 3,421 new connections expected by the end of the year. Additionally, a net-metering initiative has been launched to allow homes and businesses to sell excess solar power back to the grid, promoting sustainable energy generation.

Public Sector Recruitments:
Significant progress has been made in recruiting more teachers and health workers, aimed at improving the delivery of education and health services across the country.

Agricultural Development:
The agriculture sector remains a priority, with a focus on increasing the production of maize, wheat, soybeans, and other crops. Special attention is being given to irrigation and improving transport and logistics infrastructure to support regional and international trade.

Call for Private Sector Involvement:
President Hichilema urged stronger private sector participation in energy, agriculture, and infrastructure development. Such partnerships are expected to promote climate resilience, job creation, and inclusive economic growth.

Private Sector Support Crucial for Reforms
Andrew Chipwende, Director General of the Public Private Dialogue Forum, emphasized the importance of supporting the private sector with resources and research capabilities. “It is vital that the private sector presents well-researched proposals to the government that can be easily understood and adopted,” he said.

The forum underscored the government’s commitment to creating an enabling environment for businesses to thrive while addressing pressing challenges such as climate change and economic sustainability.

As Zambia continues on its path to economic recovery, the collaboration between the public and private sectors is expected to play a pivotal role in unlocking the country’s full potential.

Zambia has taken a significant step toward energy sufficiency with the signing of 29 Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) between Zesco and Independent Power Providers (IPPs) across the country.

The agreements, made possible through the Micro-Generator Scheme and Presidential Solar Initiative, will contribute 332 megawatts (MW) of solar power to the national grid. This marks a major milestone in the country’s efforts to diversify its energy sources, reduce reliance on hydropower, and enhance electricity security.

President Hakainde Hichilema welcomed the development, emphasizing that expanding citizen participation in the energy sector is crucial for economic growth and long-term national prosperity.

“Our government is committed to ensuring that all Zambians have access to reliable electricity,” President Hichilema stated. “By opening up the energy sector, we are not only securing a sustainable energy supply but also fostering economic development and empowerment.”

The initiative aligns with Zambia’s broader strategy to boost renewable energy investment and strengthen the country’s resilience against climate-related challenges affecting hydropower generation.

With this latest move, Zambia is positioning itself as a regional leader in sustainable energy, paving the way for increased private sector involvement and future clean energy projects.