Monday, April 21, 2025
Home Blog Page 22

UPND Dissolves Eastern Province Party Structures

18

The United Party for National Development (UPND) has dissolved its Eastern Province party structures in a bid to address internal conflicts.

The UPND Secretariat, Secretary General, Batuka Imenda disclosed that the party has dissolved its Eastern Province Provincial Committee, the district committee and community ward committee in Petauke.

ZANIS reports that Mr Imenda says the decision comes after prolonged divisions within the party, which have hindered its progress in the region.

Speaking during a press briefing, Mr Imenda said the party had been plagued by serious differences since the last election, resulting in the formation of two rival camps.

He said despite efforts to reconcile the factions, the divisions have persisted, affecting the party’s performance at the district, constituency, and ward levels.

Mr Imenda emphasised that the party’s rules and regulations must be adhered to, warning that failure to comply would have consequences.

He stated that the Secretariat decided to take measures to restore order and discipline within the party.

He noted that the dissolution of the Provincial, District and Ward committees will not affect Lusangazi and Kaumbwe, which are part of Petauke.

Mr Imende added that all district structures will be reporting directly to the Secretariat, which will work to fill the vacancies created by the dissolution.

And Mr Imenda congratulated the Tonse Alliance for its victory in Petauke and the UPND in Pembanshe, Mpongwe, and Nalikwanda by-elections

Economic Costs of Informal Businesses

9

How Informal Sector is undermining Zambia’s Economic Development

By Mwansa Chalwe Snr

“ The Trump administration has already frozen almost all foreign assistance and made moves to dismantle USAID,” CNN reported in a story of President Trump’s Executive Order suspending AID to South Africa.

The Trump administrations decision to cut foreign aid should serve as a wake-up call to Sub-Saharan Africa, including Zambia, highlighting the reality that no nation can achieve sustainable development through reliance on handouts. Zambias reliance on foreign aid has masked the need for homegrown solutions to drive development. It is now imperative for Zambia to develop homegrown solutions and leverage our natural resources to generate income for economic progress.One of the most viable solutions I have consistently advocated for in my commentaries in the past ten years to solve youth unemployment especially, is addressing the vast informal sector, which is estimated to account for 90% of the economy in Zambia and other Sub-Saharan nations. Reducing the size of the informal sector can have a significant impact on the countrys economic growth.Empirical evidence shows that no country can develop with a huge informal sector. Now is the time to implement the formalization solution.

Formalization is supported by many international organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) who believe that : "Informality critically affects how fast economies can grow, develop, and provide decent economic opportunities for their populations. Sustainable development requires a reduction in informality over time. Economic growth in regions or countries with large informal sectors remains below potential. Addressing informality is thus essential and urgent to support inclusive economic development and reduce poverty worldwide”.

They are supported by the African Development Bank who in a 2018 study entitled “Informal Sector and Economic Development in Africa” observed : "The informal sector accounts for a significant share of economic activity in Africa, but its potential can only be fully realized through formalization, which can provide access to finance, markets, and social protection. Formalization of the informal sector is crucial for Africas economic transformation, as it can lead to increased productivity, improved working conditions, and enhanced economic growth.

There is no doubt that Zambia’s current size of the informal sector carries significant economic costs, and
this article will outline those costs to encourage authorities to prioritize solving this issue, which offers
substantial benefits for economic recovery and development.

Suboptimal Production
The informal sector often operates with limited access to advanced technology, skilled labor, and efficient production methods. This results in lower productivity and output compared to formal enterprises.Suboptimal production not only limits the growth potential of these businesses but can lead to a waste of resources, reduced economic growth, and lower living standards.

Low Investment
Informal businesses typically have limited access to formal credit and financial services because they often lack collateral or formal financial records, making it difficult to secure loans or attract investment from formal sources which restricts their ability to invest in capital, technology, or expansion which leads to reduced job creation. Additionally, informal enterprises often reinvest less of their profits into their businesses due to uncertainty and the need to prioritize short-term survival over long-term growth.

Free Rider Phenomenon
The informal sector often benefits from public goods and services (e.g., infrastructure, security, and education) without contributing to their funding through taxes. This creates a “free rider problem, where informal businesses enjoy the benefits of public investments without sharing the costs. This undermines the governments ability to fund and maintain public services, placing a heavier burden on formal businesses and taxpayers.

Unfair Competition to Formal Enterprises
Informal sector businesses often operate outside of regulatory frameworks. They often avoid taxes,regulatory compliance costs, and labor protections, allowing them to operate at lower costs than formal enterprises. This creates an uneven playing field, where formal businesses struggle to compete with informal ones. Unfair competition can undermine the formal sectors ability to create jobs, drive innovation, and contribute to economic growth. Over time, this can discourage formalization and reduce the competitiveness of the formal sector.

Low Innovation
The informal sector generally lacks the resources, incentives, and institutional support needed for innovation. Informal businesses often focus on survival and short-term gains rather than investing in research and development or adopting new technologies. This limits their ability to improve products,processes, or services, which in turn hinders overall economic progress and technological advancement.Low innovation in the informal sector can limit its ability to create new jobs, drive economic growth, and improve living standards.

Large Uninsured Population
Workers in the informal sector typically lack access to social security, health insurance, and other safety nets. This leaves them vulnerable to economic shocks, health crises, and other risks. A large uninsured population increases the burden on public healthcare systems and social services, as informal workers often rely on government assistance during emergencies. This also perpetuates poverty and inequality.

Conclusion
The informal sector poses significant economic challenges, including inefficiencies, inequality, and reduced growth potential. Addressing these issues requires initiatives and policies that encourage formalization, improve access to finance and social protection, and create a level playing field for all businesses. By integrating informal workers and enterprises into the mainstream economy, governments can unlock greater economic potential and ensure more inclusive development.

To implement the formalization program, there is no need for the Zambian government to reinvent the wheel. The Zambia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ZACCI) has already developed a well-researched formalization solution that leverages mobile technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI).ZACCI has partnered with the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) and plans to collaborate with key government agencies such as the Citizen Economic Empowerment Commission (CEEC), the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), the Bank of Zambia, the Patents and Companies Registration Agency (PACRA), the National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA), National Health Insurance Management Authority (NHIMA) and various economic cluster ministries. The objective is to implement an innovative and sustainable formalization program under a soft Public Private Partnership (PPP) model which is designed to rapidly transform Zambias economy in a very short period of time.

ZACCI has benchmarked its initiative on Latin American countries like Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Columbia,Chile, Argentina, Uruguay and Ecuador who successfully implemented similar programs between 2000 and 2015 and transformed their economies. Brazil had the most dramatic transformation because its formalization program was multifaceted like the ZACCI one.

By 2012, Brazils economy had surpassed that of the UK, becoming the 6th largest in the world. The countrys GDP had grown from $552 billion in 2000 to over $2.5 trillion, GDP grew by 4.5% per annum between 2000 and 2012; foreign investment increased from $20 billion in 2000 to over $60 billion in 2012; tax revenue increased from 24% of GDP in 2000 to over 30% in 2012 ; poverty reduced as millions of Brazilians – 89%were lifted out of poverty – with the poverty rate declining from 35% in 2000 to under 20% in 2012; the middle class grew from 40% of the population in 2000 to over 50% in 2012 and
unemployment rates dropped from over 12% in 2003 to around 5% in 2012.

By addressing the informal sector, Zambia can unlock its economic potential and accelerate its move towards sustainable development, regain its economic sovereignty by doing away with excessive foreign borrowing and dependency on foreign Aid with its attendant black mail on economic, political and social policies.

The writer is a Chartered Accountant, Author and an independent financial analyst and Economic Commentator.

The Perils of Denial in Zambian Politics

25

By Kapya Kaoma

President Hakainde Hichilema (HH) and his supporters share a troubling trait: denial. They are aware that Zambians are being pushed to their limits, both politically and economically. They recognize that public confidence in President HH’s leadership has waned. In fact, they struggle to defend any of his accomplishments beyond the vague notion of “free education.”

Despite countless promises made, there is a stark contrast. President HH vowed to reduce the price of mealie meal but failed; he promised to create jobs but fell short; he committed to lowering fuel prices, yet those prices remain high; and he assured Zambians that the cost of fertilizer would decrease, but that promise, too, went unfulfilled. Instead of addressing these failures, his supporters resort to insults, dismissing anyone who questions his leadership as either tribalists or simply lazy. If Zambians were lazy during the Lungu administration, why then did HH blame Lungu for the economic situation of the country?

To me, this pattern of denial is perplexing. The same individuals who once criticized previous presidents for Zambia’s poverty now blame critics and citizens for voicing their concerns. It is unjust to have held President Lungu accountable for these failures while excusing President HH from similar critique. He has not met his promises and must be held accountable.

Sadly, those who attempt to speak out are met with police brutality and imprisonment. It doesn’t matter who speaks out; today, social media is monitored to intimidate people into silence as a way of shielding the president from public criticism.

This alarming culture of intimidation must be rejected by all Zambians. Silencing dissent through threats of imprisonment will not resolve our national problems. To assert that HH deceived Zambians to secure the presidency is not a crime; neither is it a crime to express concern about his health or mental state. The frustration felt by the public stems from the harsh economic realities we face. People will vent their anger on social media and publicly against the president since he stands at the helm of power.

To his supporters, President HH may seem like a demigod; yet, to his opponents, he is viewed as nothing but a villain. While his supporters may idolize him, those who disagree will continue to voice their discontent and may resort to derogatory language. The struggling economy will undoubtedly influence how people perceive and discuss the president. Who doesn’t eat? Who doesn’t use public transport or buy groceries? Whether one is a supporter or not, we all use the same Kwacha. Economically, things were better during the Lungu administration. Denial does not fill our pockets with money. As people compare the two administrations, they are apt to criticize HH.

It is critical, therefore, for the president and his supporters to understand this as we approach the campaign season. To believe that the opposition will worship President HH is as unrealistic as expecting the Pope to bow down to Satan.

President HH and his followers may be in denial, but not the majority of citizens. They may be silent today, and may not even show up during the ongoing by-elections. Come 2026, however, these are the ones who will make the final call. Will HH’s intimidations win him a second term? Kaya!

President Hichilema Mourns Namibia’s First President Sam Nujoma

8
Right to Left: Sam Nujoma, Samora Machel, Kenneth Kaunda, Robert Mugabe
Right to Left: Sam Nujoma, Samora Machel, Kenneth Kaunda, Robert Mugabe

President Hakainde Hichilema has expressed deep sorrow over the passing of Namibia’s founding President, Sam Nujoma, who died at the age of 95 in Windhoek.

In his tribute, President Hichilema described Dr. Nujoma as a freedom fighter, nationalist, and Pan-Africanist whose legacy will endure. He emphasized that Dr. Nujoma’s contributions to Namibia’s independence and African unity would always be remembered.

Dr. Nujoma played a pivotal role in Namibia’s liberation struggle, helping to establish the South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) in the 1960s. His leadership in the protracted fight against South African rule led to Namibia gaining independence in 1990. Following independence, he served as the country’s first president from 1990 to 2005.

Namibian President Nangolo Mbumba confirmed Dr. Nujoma’s passing, stating that he had been hospitalized for three weeks with an illness from which he could not recover. President Mbumba praised him as an inspirational leader who championed the cause of freedom and self-determination.

Beyond leading Namibia to independence, Dr. Nujoma is widely credited with ensuring stability and peace in the nation. His policy of national reconciliation encouraged the country’s white community to remain and contribute to the economy, particularly in the agricultural sector. He also advocated for the rights of women and children, instituting policies to support single mothers and strengthen child welfare protections.

Tributes from across the African continent have poured in, honoring Dr. Nujoma’s legacy. African Union Commission Chairman Moussa Faki Mahamat described him as “the epitome of courage,” never wavering in his vision for a free Namibia and a united Africa. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa hailed him as an “extraordinary freedom fighter” who not only led Namibia’s struggle against colonial rule but also supported South Africa’s fight against apartheid.

Kenyan President William Ruto also paid tribute, calling Dr. Nujoma a “visionary leader” who dedicated his life to Namibia’s liberation and development.

As Namibia prepares for his state funeral, many Namibians have expressed profound sadness at the loss of the leader they fondly remember as the “Father of the Nation.”

300 Mourners Sick After Eating Suspected Poisonous Food at Funeral in Kalulushi

11

About 300 people are alleged to have eaten suspected poisonous food at a funeral house in Magam area of Kalulushi District on the Copperbelt Province.

Both Copperbelt Police Commissioner, Peacewell Mweemba, and Kalulushi District Medical Officer, Fortune Mumba confirmed the development to Zambia News and Information Services (ZANIS) in Kalulushi.

Mr Mweemba said the incident happened on Friday after the first group of mourners ate the food packed in small colorless plastic packs mixing nshima with chicken, beans and impwa.

He said later, about 300 people who ate the food, started complaining of diarrhoea and vomiting.

Mr Mweemba explained that when police visited the clinic, it was confirmed that 66 victims were received and attended to, and only six were referred to Kalulushi General Hospital.

Kalulushi District Medical Officer, Dr Mumba, confirmed having received 130 victims from clinics and the General hospital who were attended to and only 13 were admitted and their conditions stable, while the rest were discharged.

Meanwhile, the police have continued with investigations on the matter.

Yusuf Dodia warns of Risks in Government Partnerships

8

Economic analyst Yusuf Dodia has advised the Zambian government to approach Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) with caution, warning that if not carefully structured, such agreements could lead to unintended negative consequences.

Dodia acknowledged that PPPs can be an effective tool for infrastructure development and economic growth, offering alternative financing solutions for large-scale projects. However, he cautioned that not all sectors are suitable for such partnerships, urging the government to conduct thorough feasibility studies before committing to new agreements.

One of his major concerns is the potential over-reliance on the private sector, which could result in the loss of government control over critical national assets. He pointed out that sectors such as roads, airspace, and key government machinery must remain under state oversight to avoid placing national infrastructure in the hands of profit-driven private entities.

Public opinion on PPPs in Zambia has been divided. While some see them as a pragmatic solution to budget constraints, others worry about poorly negotiated contracts that favor private investors at the expense of the public. In previous cases, such partnerships have been criticized for lack of transparency, with concerns that foreign companies dominate these deals, reducing opportunities for local businesses and workers.

The Zambian government has promoted PPPs as a way to boost economic development without overburdening public finances. However, past experiences with privatization in the mining sector have left many citizens skeptical, fearing that poorly managed PPPs could lead to similar pitfalls, such as unfair revenue-sharing models and long-term economic disadvantages.

To mitigate risks, Dodia urged authorities to take a balanced approach ensuring that PPPs are structured with strong legal frameworks that protect public interests while still allowing private sector participation. He emphasized that public consultations and transparency should be at the heart of these agreements to avoid corruption and mismanagement.

With Zambia seeking new avenues for economic growth and infrastructure expansion, the debate over PPPs remains critical. As discussions continue, the government faces the challenge of striking the right balance leveraging private investment without compromising national sovereignty and long-term economic stability.

Kidney Foundation Zambia Questions UTH’s Ambitious Transplant Target

3

Kidney Foundation Zambia Questions UTH’s Ambitious Transplant Target

The Kidney Foundation Zambia has raised concerns over the University Teaching Hospital’s (UTH) ambitious goal of conducting 20 kidney transplants this year, warning that the target appears to be more of a projection than a practical reality.

UTH recently announced its intention to carry out at least 20 transplants within the year, a move welcomed as a step toward improving specialized healthcare in Zambia. However, Foundation Secretary-General Augustine Mukuka has expressed skepticism, pointing out that despite the government’s commitment, only a handful of transplants have been successfully completed since the program’s inception.

Mukuka highlighted that most of these procedures have relied heavily on foreign aid and external expertise, raising questions about Zambia’s capacity to independently sustain a robust transplant program. He emphasized the urgent need to build local capacity, invest in advanced medical infrastructure, and train more specialists to handle kidney transplants effectively.

Beyond setting ambitious targets, Mukuka urged the government to take tangible actions that ensure more Zambians have access to affordable and life-saving kidney treatment. He stressed that without sustainable strategies, many patients will continue to face financial and logistical barriers to receiving critical medical care.

As Zambia pushes to expand its organ transplant program, experts agree that success will depend not just on numerical targets but on long-term investments in healthcare systems, skilled personnel, and patient accessibility. The call now is for real progress over projections—a challenge the government must address with urgency.

Zambia’s Constitution Crossroads: LAZ Cautions Against Rushed Reforms

12

The Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) has issued a cautionary statement to the government, advising against initiating constitutional reforms so close to the upcoming general elections. LAZ President Lungisani Zulu emphasized that such late-stage amendments could encounter significant political resistance and public skepticism.

Mr. Zulu highlighted that LAZ had consistently urged the United Party for National Development (UPND) government to establish a clear roadmap for constitutional reforms immediately after taking office. He noted that the early stages of governance presented an ideal opportunity to draft a constitution that reflects broad-based consensus.

Despite these persistent appeals, the government did not act on LAZ’s recommendations. Now, with approximately 18 months remaining before the next general elections, political tensions are escalating. Any attempt to amend the constitution at this juncture risks being perceived as politically motivated or designed to favor the ruling party.

The issue of constitutional reform in Zambia has a complex and contentious history. Over the past decades, multiple attempts have been made to amend the constitution, often leading to public debate and division. For instance, in 2016, a constitutional referendum was held alongside the general elections, aiming to amend and enhance the Bill of Rights and revise Article 79. Although 71% of voters supported the amendments, the referendum failed to meet the required threshold, rendering the results invalid.

Public sentiment towards constitutional reforms has been mixed. While there is a general consensus on the need for a constitution that upholds democratic principles and human rights, concerns have been raised about the inclusivity and transparency of the reform processes. In 2019, proposed amendments were criticized for potentially enhancing executive powers at the expense of the legislature and judiciary, leading to fears of authoritarianism.

Civil society organizations and legal experts have also expressed apprehension about the timing and nature of proposed reforms. The South African Institute of International Affairs noted that constitutional reform has become increasingly politicized in Zambia, with debates often reflecting deeper political tensions.

In light of this history, Mr. Zulu’s call for caution is particularly pertinent. He urges the government to ensure that any constitutional amendments are pursued in an open and consultative manner, involving a wide range of stakeholders to build consensus and avoid political controversy.

As Zambia approaches the next general elections, the path to constitutional reform remains fraught with challenges. Balancing the need for timely amendments with the imperative of maintaining public trust and political stability will be crucial in shaping the nation’s democratic future.

What are the implications of PF’s hero welcome of “Why me” ?

15

Yesterday, the Edgar Lungu Patriotic Front (PF) faction top-brass, led by acting president, Given Lubinda, accorded one Francis Kapwepwe, otherwise better known as ‘Why me,’ a hero’s welcome from prison. They showered him with accolades and lauded him as a freedom fighter.

“Why me….you’ve now graduated from being a blogger to a freedom fighter,” Lubinda eulogised him; much like a proud father would say to a son who has just graduated from university Cum Laude.

“You fought the battle and you’ve succeeded. Those who thought they were going to break you must now be ashamed of themselves.”

What do we make of this?

For those who may not be aware, the Livingstone magistrates court handed Kapwepwe a one year prison sentence for hate speech and use of insulting language. However, the young man with a foul mouth will not endure another 12 months in the penitentiary growing Cabbages or feeding pigs as he has already seen off the length of his sentence during his incarceration in remand prison.

Before he met his Waterloo, ‘Why me’ would make forays on TikTok and take pleasure in slowly undressing his innocent victims and describe their genitals in the most horrific and vile terms, as he sipped bottles of chilled flying fish. He did not spare anyone – those in authority, celebrities, the rich or even those scrounging a living in the ghettos! Isn’t this the same chap who once asked Hon. Bowman Lusambo, a senior member of PF, to allow him a few moments with his wife so that he can demonstrate how it is done?

And yet today, the PF want us to believe the best specimen of a human being with a flawed character coupled with an uncouth and insolent behaviour, with his mouth polluted with vulgar language has undergone an excruciating one year of trial and persecution. What persecution when this overnight hero of yours has been breaking the law with impunity?

It is shocking that Lubinda can encourage our youth to emulate the ex-convict. Kapwepwe does not in any way qualify to be the best example of how our young people must conduct themselves in society. What sort of a future do you wish to bequeath to our children? One devoid of culture or values whereby young people shall not step aside or leave their seats for our senior citizens, speak with elders with hands deep into their pockets while adorned in baseball caps?

As Miles Sampa, the Matero member of parliament, observes, after months in prison, we expect Kapwepwe to be encouraged to have ample time with his family, well if at all he has one, enjoy enough rest and reflect on his past evil deeds, so that once he resumes blogging, he is going to do so within the confines of the law. He should not be hijacked by desperate politicians and be incited to commit similar offenses which may end up landing him in prison again.

As a matter of fact, during his darkest hours as he languished in the hell-hole called prison, PF leaders avoided him like the plague. It’s only Sampa who was willing to step forward and put his neck on the chopping board as his surety, and yet today vultures want to celebrate him. Cowards…..nay, hypocrites!

They say a leopard can never change its stripes. And neither can a sweet potato be straightened. PF has just demonstrated to us that it can not shed off its old ugly ways, the way a snake changes its skin! During its time in power, the PF was notorious for unleashing skin-crawling spates of violence and spewing ear perforating insults, amongst other atrocities.

‘No thanks’: White South Africans turn down Trump’s immigration offer

7

U.S. President Donald Trump’s offer to rehouse white South Africans as refugees fleeing persecution may not spur quite the rush he anticipates, as even right-wing white lobby groups want to “tackle the injustices” of Black majority rule on home soil.
Trump on Friday signed an executive order to cut U.S. aid to South Africa, citing an expropriation act that President Cyril Ramaphosa signed last month aiming to redress land inequalities that stem from South Africa’s history of white supremacy.

The order provided for resettlement in the U.S. of “Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination” as refugees.
Afrikaners are mostly white descendants of early Dutch and French settlers, who own most of the country’s farmland.
“If you haven’t got any problems here, why would you want to go,” said Neville van der Merwe, a 78-year-old pensioner in Bothasig near Cape Town.

“There hasn’t been any really bad taking over our land, the people are carrying on like normal and you know, what are you going to do over there?”
The law seeks to address racial land ownership disparities – which has left three-quarters of privately owned land in the hands of the white minority – by making it easier for the state to expropriate land in the public interest.
Ramaphosa has defended the policy.

White people represent 7.2% of South Africa’s population of 63 million, statistics agency data shows. The data does not breakdown how many are Afrikaner.
South Africa’s British rulers handed most farmland to whites. In 1950, the Apartheid-era National Party seized 85% of the land, forcing 3.5 million Black people from their homes.
Ramaphosa’s African National Congress (ANC), the biggest party in the ruling coalition, says Trump is amplifying misinformation propagated by AfriForum, an Afrikaner-led group.

The group, which lobbied Trump’s previous administration on their cause, said it was not taking up the offer.
“Emigration only offers an opportunity for Afrikaners who are willing to risk potentially sacrificing their descendants’ cultural identity as Afrikaners. The price for that is simply too high,” AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said on Saturday.

HOMELAND

Separately, the Solidarity Movement – which includes AfriForum and Solidarity trade union and said it represents about 600,000 Afrikaner families and 2 million individuals – expressed commitment to South Africa.
“We may disagree with the ANC, but we love our country. As in any community, there are individuals who wish to emigrate, but repatriation of Afrikaners as refugees is not a solution for us,” the Movement said.
Representatives of Orania, an Afrikaner-only enclave in the heart of the country, also rejected Trump’s offer.
“Afrikaners do not want to be refugees. We love and are committed to our homeland,” Orania said.
South Africa’s land policies since the end of apartheid have never involved forced seizure of white-owned land.
Still, some said they appreciated Trump’s offer.
“I think it’s a very nice gesture from Donald Trump to offer us asylum over there,” said Werner van Niekerk, 57, a carpenter in Bothasig, without saying whether he would be migrating to America.
Others saw the funny side.
“Some questions: is there a test to determine your Afrikanership? Must you hold AfriForum membership? … Will Elon help with some startup cash on the other side? … Are there bakkies (pick-up trucks) in the U.S.?”, author Pieter du Toit wrote on X, referring to South African-born billionaire and Trump aide Elon Musk.

Reuters

President Hichilema Strengthens Ties with Japan During High-Level Engagements

3

In a series of high-level meetings aimed at bolstering bilateral relations and fostering economic cooperation, President Hakainde Hichilema on the 7th February held talks with key Japanese institutions and leaders during his working visit to Japan. The engagements underscored Zambia’s commitment to deepening partnerships with Japan, a nation that has been a steadfast ally since the establishment of diplomatic ties in 1964.

President Hichilema met with delegations from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the Japan Organisation for Metals and Energy (JOGMEC), led by JICA President Dr. Tanaka Akihiko and JOGMEC President Mr. Ichiro Takahara, respectively. During the discussions, the President expressed Zambia’s gratitude for JICA’s longstanding support across various sectors, including infrastructure, health, and education.

President Hichilema meets with delegations from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the Japan Organisation for Metals and Energy (JOGMEC), led by presidents Dr. Tanaka Akihiko and Mr. Ichiro Takahara

“We are deeply appreciative of JICA’s contributions to Zambia’s development over the years,” President Hichilema stated. “We now urge JICA to consider investing in technology and innovation, particularly in critical sectors such as agriculture and energy, to further drive our economic growth agenda.”

The President specifically highlighted the need for advanced technology to address challenges in Lusaka’s drainage system, a project that could significantly improve the quality of life for residents in the capital city.

In his meeting with JOGMEC, President Hichilema commended the organization’s progress in mineral exploration in Zambia. He expressed hope that JOGMEC’s ongoing geophysical mapping efforts would not only enhance the mining sector but also help curb illegal mining activities, which have posed significant economic and environmental challenges.

“Our mission remains clear: to improve the lives of all Zambians,” President Hichilema emphasized. “Collaborations with institutions like JICA and JOGMEC are vital to achieving this goal.”

Later in the day, President Hichilema had the distinct honor of meeting His Majesty Emperor Naruhito at the Imperial Palace in Tokyo. The discussion centered on issues of mutual interest to Zambia and Japan, reaffirming the strong bond between the two nations.

“Our two countries have enjoyed a long-standing relationship built on mutual respect and shared values,” President Hichilema remarked. “We are committed to further strengthening this partnership for the benefit of our people.”

As President Hichilema concluded his working visit, he expressed profound gratitude to the Government and people of Japan for their warm hospitality.

“This visit has been a testament to the enduring friendship between Zambia and Japan,” he said. “We look forward to building on these engagements to create a brighter future for both our nations.”

“Why Me” sentenced to 12 Months for Hate Speech and Tribal Incitement

14

Francis Kapwepwe, widely known by the moniker “Why Me,” has been sentenced to 12 months imprisonment with hard labor on two counts of hate speech and inciting tribal hatred. The sentencing, handed down by Livingstone Magistrate Thabita Mulenga-Muleya, marks a significant moment in Zambia’s ongoing efforts to address divisive rhetoric and promote social cohesion.

Kapwepwe was arrested and charged after allegedly making statements that expressed hatred toward individuals based on their tribe, a violation of Zambia’s laws aimed at curbing hate speech and tribal discrimination. In her ruling, Magistrate Mulenga-Muleya emphasized the seriousness of the offenses, stating that such actions undermine national unity and social harmony.

The two sentences will run concurrently, meaning Kapwepwe will serve a total of 12 months in prison from the date of his arrest.

Following the verdict, Kapwepwe’s legal representative, Anthony Bwalya of KBF and Partners, expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision. In an interview with journalists, Bwalya commended the judicial process for its fairness and independence.

“We are happy with the judgment and proud to have provided legal representation in a case that was handled without political influence,” Bwalya said. “This demonstrates the integrity of our judicial system and its commitment to upholding the rule of law.”

The case has sparked widespread debate in Zambia, where tribal tensions and hate speech remain sensitive issues. Legal experts and civil society organizations have welcomed the ruling as a step toward deterring divisive rhetoric and promoting accountability.

Magistrate Mulenga-Muleya’s decision underscores the judiciary’s role in addressing actions that threaten national unity, particularly in a country that prides itself on its motto, “One Zambia, One Nation.”

As Kapwepwe begins his sentence, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of fostering dialogue and understanding in a diverse society, while holding individuals accountable for actions that fuel division and hatred.

President Hichilema Joins Regional Leaders at EAC-SADC Summit to Address DRC Conflict

11

President Hakainde Hichilema, arrived in Dar es Salaam today to participate in a pivotal Joint Summit between the East African Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The high-level meeting, convened to address the escalating conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), brings together regional leaders to forge a unified path toward peace and stability in the troubled region.

This is according to a statement released to the media by Clayson Hamasaka, State house Communications Specialist.

The Summit, which underscores the critical role of regional cooperation in resolving security challenges, aims to foster collective efforts to end the violence in Eastern DRC. By uniting the EAC and SADC, the gathering highlights the shared commitment of African leaders to pursue sustainable solutions through dialogue, diplomacy, and coordinated action.

President Hichilema, a staunch advocate for peace and stability as cornerstones of sustainable development, has long emphasized that instability in one region threatens the security of all. His participation in the Summit reflects his unwavering belief that regional security concerns must be addressed through collective engagement and collaboration among nations.

“Peace, security, and stability are not just ideals; they are necessities for development and prosperity,” President Hichilema stated ahead of the Summit. “The crisis in the DRC demands a unified response from the region, and Zambia stands ready to contribute to these efforts.”

As a key participant in the discussions, President Hichilema is expected to leverage his diplomatic influence and strong relationships with regional Heads of State to advance peacebuilding initiatives. His leadership will focus on promoting dialogue and fostering solutions that address the root causes of the conflict, with the ultimate goal of restoring stability and creating conditions for lasting peace in Eastern DRC.

The Joint Summit comes at a critical juncture, as the DRC conflict continues to displace thousands and destabilize the broader region. The collaboration between the EAC and SADC signals a renewed determination among African leaders to tackle the crisis head-on, prioritizing the well-being of affected communities and the long-term security of the continent.

President Hichilema’s presence at the Summit reaffirms Zambia’s commitment to regional peace and its active role in shaping a brighter future for Africa.

Analysis Of White Paper -Medium Term Budget Plan(MTBP) 2025- 2027

1

On 2nd February 2025, the Government of Zambia unveiled its Medium-Term Budget Plan (MTBP) also known as the white paper for the years 2025-2027, aimed at addressing critical issues such as managing government debt, eradicating poverty, and tackling the chronic shortfall in power supply. This statement analyses the MTBP, its underlying facts, and the socio-economic impact on the Zambian populace.

The MTBP sets forth notable macroeconomic targets, including a reduction of the fiscal deficit from a target of 3.1% of GDP in 2025 to 0.7% by 2027. Economic growth is expected to start at 6.6% in 2025 and taper by 0.5% each year, reaching 5.6% by 2027, primarily driven by the mining sector, particularly copper. The government also plans to increase domestic revenue from 20.5% of GDP in 2025 to 21.2% by 2027 through new tax policies and compliance measures, while aiming for an inflation rate of 6-8% to combat rising food costs.

It is the position of the Civil Society for Poverty Reduction (CSPR) that achieving a 6% real GDP growth in the medium term is ambitious, especially following a downturn in 2024, where projected growth fell to 1.3% from a target of 4.5% at the start of 2024. This starkly contrasts with the 5.7% growth in 2023. CSPR notes that projected growth will largely depend on increased copper mining activities informed by the 3million metric tonnes production annual target in 9 years embarked on by the Government and favorable rainfall during the 2024-2025 season. However, there are concerns regarding the heavy reliance on copper output and the assumption of stable global prices averaging around $10,195. Should global commodity prices decline; an ever-looming possibility, Zambia may struggle to meet its growth targets, highlighting the necessity for diversification given the internal structural challenges that have historically and presently hindered the economy’s resilience, particularly in the energy sector.

Zambia is currently grappling with a significant debt challenge exacerbated by both external and domestic obligations. Over the medium term, the government plans to allocate K147.8 billion solely for debt interest payments, with K126.7 billion for domestic debt servicing and K21.2 billion for external debt. This substantial debt service burden limits the fiscal space available for essential social services and developmental initiatives. Fluctuations in the exchange rate and global economy dynamics may deteriorate efforts to effectively align Government’s annual budgets to the MTBP hence CSPR calls on the Government to take a more malleable and consultative approach.

The urgency of implementing sound fiscal policies cannot be overstated, as the government must develop strategies that enhance revenue collection and prudently manage expenditures to maintain sustainable debt levels. Failure to navigate these challenges could unintentionally lead to fiscal instability, jeopardising the macro economic targets outlined in the MTBP. Even as the government seeks to enhance domestic revenue mobilization, CSPR calls on the Government to strictly consider a progressive tax system which is common practice in relatively successful countries with regards equitable tax administration. This is essential in lessening the tax burden on the majority of the poor.

The rising inflation rate, fueled mostly by the continuously depreciating local currency against the US dollar is of concern to CSPR. Particularly food inflation rate currently stands at 19.2%, of January 2025 ZAMSTATS report and poses significant challenges for households, as food constitutes a major portion of their monthly expenses. This inflationary pressure threatens poverty alleviation efforts, impacting approximately 60% of the Zambian population. It is our considered view that to address these issues, the government must enact effective fiscal interventions designed to stabilize prices and enhance production. The success of the MTBP and its growth targets will be contingent upon creating an environment conducive to investment while ensuring affordability for ordinary Zambians. That balance is necessary and an approach the government must not ignore.

The MTBP outlines a comprehensive strategy that interconnects education, health, water access, and social protection which are crucial elements for advancing human and social development. The government has set ambitious targets and allocations to ensure these sectors receive requisite funding, vital for cultivating a resilient and productive population. The proposed expenditure plan allocates K49.2 billion for social protection programs during the medium term, aimed at strengthening the welfare of vulnerable populations. Key allocations include K14.1 billion for 2025, K15.1 billion for 2026, and K20.0 billion for 2027, indicating a significant rise in investment directed towards marginalised groups.

Within this budget, the Social Cash Transfer Program receives K29.0 billion, providing direct financial assistance to approximately 1.5 million low-income households. Additionally, K15.8 billion is allocated to the Pension Fund to ensure timely pension payments, while K4.4 billion is earmarked for the Food Security Pack to bolster food distribution and agricultural initiatives. In education, the MTBP allocates approximately K12 billion, focusing on constructing and rehabilitating 1,000 schools to achieve a 95% gross enrolment rate in primary education by 2027, alongside recruiting 20,000 teachers to improve the current teacher-to-student ratio. Furthermore, K1.5 billion is designated for Technical Education, Vocational and Entrepreneurship Training (TEVET), supporting around 50,000 students annually through scholarships. This is commendable and the Government is urged to effect efficient implementation plans for these well intended initiatives with a comprehensive targeting model that is well aligned with current targets in the NDPs.
In health, K15 billion is allocated for constructing and rehabilitating 300 health facilities, aiming for 80% healthcare coverage in rural areas by 2027, alongside the recruitment of 10,000 healthcare workers. Additionally, K500 million is set aside for disease surveillance and pandemic preparedness, underscoring the government’s commitment to public health. CSPR wishes to advise government and stress the importance of contingent financing planning in these sectors especially in light of donor dependency dynamics.

The 2025-2027 MTBP presents a pivotal opportunity for Zambia to foster sustainable growth and development. However, achieving these ambitious targets will require robust execution of policies that address the intertwined challenges of debt, inflation, and socio-economic disparities. We call upon the government to ensure transparency and accountability as it implements these strategies, engaging all stakeholders to ensure that the benefits of economic progress reach every Zambian. With concerted efforts and strategic planning, Zambia can build a resilient economy that uplifts the lives of all its citizens. CSPR notes that Zambia’s growth projections for the medium term (2025-2027) hinge significantly on the successful implementation of the 8th National Development Plan (8NDP), which prioritizes inclusive economic growth and sustainable development. If Zambia can effectively align its growth strategies with the 8NDP’s inclusive framework, the projected growth rate of 6 percent is plausible as the framework calls for economic diversification in line with the vison 2030.

Issued by:
Isabel Mutembo Mukelabai.
Executive Director
Civil Society for Poverty Reduction (CSPR)

To protect free media, alleged police interference during the UN envoy’s Zambia visit needs deeper scrutiny

20

By Venus N Msyani

On Monday, January 27, 2025, UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, Irene Khan, visited Flava FM radio station in Kitwe, Zambia. It was alleged that Zambia Police attempted to prevent her from conducting interviews, a claim initially refuted by both Flava FM management and the Zambia Police.

However, during an interview with Diamond TV, Flava FM proprietor Chishala Chitoshi revealed that two police officers had visited the station two and a half hours before the UN envoy’s arrival. After visiting Flava FM, the police officers proceeded to another station where Irene Khan was scheduled to visit.

“Ok, so here is a clarification and take it from me and obviously from somebody who was present and not from people that are alleging to have contacts, quote and quote, on a ground. Two police officers arrived earlier in the day before the interview with the rapporteur and they came and spoke to my members of staff and queried about the visit from the UN rapporteur. They wanted information basely pertaining to what was going on.

My members of staff gave them the information they required after asking for ID and they said Ok we are having yes; we are having the UN chief coming over and she is coming for interview. After that they did not stay; there was no presence of any police at the radio station. In fact, I am given to understand that they left to go to Radio Chengelo to ask the same questions. I am not sure; you can confirm that,” clarified Chitoshi later on Diamond TV.

The timing of these visits has raised suspicions of interference with the media’s ability to operate freely. The mere presence of law enforcement officers at radio stations, especially before interviews with a high-profile UN envoy, can create an atmosphere of intimidation. This situation is deeply troubling for media freedom and the integrity of journalistic work in Zambia and beyond.

To maintain transparency and avoid any perception of interference, it is essential for authorities to communicate clearly and disclose police visits publicly. The purpose of these visits should be explained to all parties involved, including the media and the UN envoy. This approach would prevent misunderstandings and unwarranted suspicions.

Respecting and adhering to international standards for media freedom is crucial, especially when international observers like Irene Khan are involved. The past two and a half years of the United Party for National Development (UPND) rule have been marked by numerous complaints of human rights violations, prompting the United Nations Human Rights to issue a statement in August last year. Zambia was advised to halt the downward spiral of infringements on fundamental freedoms.

In response, the UPND government invited Irene Khan to assess issues related to freedom of expression and opinion in the country. She arrived in Zambia on January 20, 2025, for this purpose and concluded her visit on January 31. Among Ms. Khan’s main roles was to assess the media environment and ensure that journalists can operate without fear or intimidation. Any action that might undermine this must be thoroughly scrutinized.

If Ms. Khan was not aware of the police visits to the radio stations she was visiting, it could impact the context of her conversations with journalists. Knowing about such visits might have helped her assess whether there was any intimidation or pressure on the media.

To prevent similar issues in the future, measures should be implemented to ensure that international observers are informed about any unusual activities, such as police visits to media outlets, during their missions. Clear guidelines should be established for law enforcement on how to interact with the media during such visits. This would help prevent any perceptions of interference or intimidation.

Above all, there should be a way to ensure that all visits by law enforcement to media outlets are publicly disclosed and the reasons for such visits clearly explained. These steps would contribute to a more transparent and fair assessment of the media environment by international observers, supporting the protection of media freedom.