
CHIEF Government spokesperson Ronnie Shikapwasha says Government has been vindicated by the revelation that Patriotic Front (PF) president Michael Sata was part of a 1992 committee of eight ministers which concluded that the Barotse Agreement was stale and illegal.
Lieutenant-General Shikapwasha said in an interview on January 10 that the people of Zambia should now know that Mr Sata is not a reliable person.
Gen. Shikapwasha said when Mr Sata was in authority, he did not even want to consider the restoration of the agreement which he is now advocating.
He said Mr Sata should be honest enough to tell Zambians that he is just looking for votes.
Former PF secretary general Edward Mumbi said at a press briefing on Sunday that on October 22, 1992, the committee of ministers met a delegation led by the Ngambela and members of the Barotse Royal Establishment (BRE) to discuss the agreement.
“Mr Sata has been telling people that he can solve the problems of those calling for the restoration of the Barotse Agreement. We have always told Zambians that Mr Sata is not to be trusted. As Government, we have been vindicated because Mr Sata has continued telling falsehoods,” he said.
When contacted for comment, Mr Sata refused to say anything on the matter, insisting that he should have been contacted earlier.
Mr Mumbi said at the press briefing that Mr Sata’s committee arrived at the conclusion that the Kaunda government’s appointment of the Litunga as member of the Central Committee was among the events which affected the Barotseland Agreement.
Mr Mumbi said the committee observed that the Chiluba government had been in power barely 12 months and the agreement referred to was signed in 1964 and abrogated in 1969 through a constitutional amendment.
The committee of ministers noted that since 1964, a lot of events had taken place in Zambia.
It further observed that the 1969 referendum, which took away property rights and was fully supported by all Zambians including the people of Western Province, was one of the events which gave Dr Kaunda’s government authority to abrogate the 1964 agreement.
The committee also observed that the replacement of the 1964 constitution and the subsequent appointment of the Litunga tended to affect the status of the Barotseland Agreement of 1964.
Mr Mumbi said Mr Sata’s committee slowed down Government’s attention to the agreement and finally put it to rest with another letter dated August 18, 1993.
“It is Government’s position that we cannot negotiate this agreement on the following grounds: Our further inquiries show that no judicial process was commenced by the royal establishment or any other party aggrieved by the proposed amendments in reasonable time. It is our position that the demand is stale, as it has been overtaken by events and is no longer legal,” the letter reads in part.
Mr Mumbi, who displayed both letters, also challenged Mr Sata to explain to Zambians why he asked then President Chiluba to drop the recognition of the Litunga in 1996.
[Zambia Daily Mail]