
By Henry Kyambalesa
In an article entitled “Give Us Time to Finish Projects,” which appeared in the Times of Zambia of 4th October 2010, President Rupiah Banda is quoted as having asked Zambians to give the MMD and his government another term of office to enable them complete the ongoing development programs in the country.
Firstly, this suggests that Comrade Kenneth D. Kaunda should have been given more time to complete the Chipata-Mchinji railway project, for example, which was initiated in 1982 as a joint venture between Zambia, Malawi and Mozambique, and which was completed this year.
Secondly, the people expect that any new Republican president would be obliged to adopt and implement projects and programs initiated by previous administrations which are designed to benefit communities nationwide. And this is the way the government has been administered in Zambia thus far, and it is the only way in which all democratic countries worldwide are administered as a matter of fact!
Thirdly, the President needs to acknowledge the fact that most of the ongoing development programs were started before he was elected to the presidency, and are partly or wholly financed by multilateral institutions, and/or bilateral cooperating partners like Canada (CIDA), China, Denmark (DANIDA), France, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Japan (JICA), The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden (SIDA), the United Kingdom (DFID), and the USA (USAID).
Sooner or later, we are going to be continually bombarded by other rehearsed, stale and meaningless campaign tools coined by MMD cadres, sympathizers and sycophants, such as the following:
(a) That we should not experiment with leadership. Well, many of the current crop of government leaders are deadwood and, therefore, do not hold the key to Zambia’s future.
(b) That voters should not vote for presidential candidates from political parties which do not have a majority in parliament because they will not be able to pass new laws. Well, any new Republican president should be able to run the country with existing laws, even enact some essential pieces of legislation.
(c) That voters should not vote for presidential candidates from political parties which do not have a majority in parliament because such candidates will have problems in the appointment of government Ministers, since the 1996 Republican constitution requires that such Ministers be appointed from Members of Parliament. Well, a president-elect who wishes to trim the current bloated government to at most 12 Cabinet portfolios, abolish the position of Deputy Minister, and provide for the administration of provinces by elected governors rather than by Provincial Ministers would not be encumbered by this; he or she would nominate 8 technocrats to Parliament and appoint them as government Ministers, and then figure out how to fill the remaining 4 Cabinet portfolios—possibly by poaching a few MPs from other political parties.
(d) That voters should vote for parliamentary candidates fielded by the ruling political party because such candidates will have ready access to funding. Well, all MPs have access to Constituency Development Funds regardless of the political parties they belong to, and any additional funds allocated exclusively to ruling party MPs are not likely to be lawful.
(e) That voters should not expect development to take place in their areas if they vote for candidates from opposition political parties. Really? We need leaders who recognize citizens’ right to vote for candidates of their choice without being threatened that their communities will be excluded from the development process if they do not vote for candidates fielded by the ruling political party.
(f) That one can never become president unless he or she is meant to be. No, in a democratic country like Zambia, an individual can become president through genuine and competitive elections. Only in pseudo democracies and totalitarian states would a citizen become president if he or she is meant to be – that is, through coronation! And
(g) That Vision 2030 will bring salvation to Zambia. I doubt it. Such a Vision is going to be a mere dream and an empty MMD campaign tool if President Banda and his administration cannot immediately and seriously start to address such issues as education and training, public health and sanitation, sustained food security, public infrastructure, corruption and other forms of criminal activity, and so forth.