Lawyers representing former president, Frederick Chiluba have argued that the registration of the London High Court judgment in the Lusaka High Court was done outside the provisions of the law.
Lawyers John Sangwa and Robert Simeza were submitting before Judge Japhet Banda today when the matter came up for hearing of the four applications made by Dr. Chiluba, Faustine Kabwe, Aaron Chungu and Stella Chibanda, to set aside the Lnodon High Court judgment.
The other application was on the notice of an intention to raise preliminery issues
on whether part II of the foreign judgment reciprocal enforcement Act of the London
High Court handed down on the respondents on May 4, 2007 was done properly.
Dr Chiluba’s lawyers argued that there were some conditions that were to be
satisified before a judgment of the foreign court judgment is registered in Zambia.
“What this means is that a person desiring to register a foreign judgment must
ensure that the judgment passes certain threshold,” Mr. Simeza said.
And Mr. Sangwa submitted that the registration of the London High Court judgment in
the Zanbian courts was nullity, adding that part II of the said Act had not been
extended to the judgment of a foreign country.
He said the power to extend part II of the Act to register foreign judgments was
vested in the President, adding that of relevance to the preliminary issues was
section 31 of the same Act, which provides the procedures for the extension of the
foreign judgment.
He said the President must be satisfied that if he gave recognition of his country,
the foreign country must also recognise the judgments made by the Zambian courts.
Mr. Sangwa also said a President of a particular country must issue a statutory
instrument or an order for the extension of the foreign judgment.
“The precondition is that the President must be satisfied that the court in a
foreign country will accord similar recognition of the judgment in the Zambian
court. There has to be reciprocity in the benefits,” he said.
He submitted that in the event that those preconditions were not met, such judgment
could not be registered and even enforced in Zambia.
He pointed out that since the 1930s, no government or president in Zambia has ever
issued an order extending part II of the Act to the United Kingdom or to the London
High Court of Justice.
“From 1964 to date, we stand to be corrected by the learned Attorney General, none
of the Presidents in Zambia has ever issued a statutory order extending part II of
the Act to the UK. If there is, no judgment from UK can be recognised in this
country, that is the law,” he said.
Mr. Sangwa said if there was any order issues, then the Attorney General, Mumba
Malila should state who issued it and when it was issued.
On this Mr. Malila said the lawyers for the defendants had ambushed him because
certain issues they argued about were not clearly stated in their affidavits.
He therefore applied for an adjournment for him to ascertain the facts of the
arguments.
“Having been misled by the affidavit which was filed as to which facts defendants
will rely upon, it is only fair my Lord that we be given an opportunity to ascertain
the fact so that the court has a well informed fact before a ruling is made on the
preliminery issue made,” he pleaded.
But Mr. Sangwa said he was taken aback by the application for an adjounrment to
ascertain the facts, saying it was basic and fundamental to consider the issue of
whether there was an order on the registration of a foreign judgment into the
Zambian court before Mr. Malila could do so.
However, the Judge Banda adjourned the matter to Friday, July 13th, 2007 to allow
Mr. Malila ascertain the fact on the issues.
Meanwhile, scores of Dr. Chiluba’s supporters and sympathisers gathered outside the
court premises singing solidarity songs.